Are Movies Making Us Smarter?

The Role of Cinematic Evolution in the Flynn Effect

in Projections
Author:
Tim J. Smith Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London and head of the Cognition in Naturalistic Environments (CINE) Lab, London, UK tj.smith@bbk.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Tim J. Smith in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Claire Essex University of London, London, UK

Search for other papers by Claire Essex in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Rachael Bedford University of Bath, Bath, UK

Search for other papers by Rachael Bedford in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

IQ tests have charted massive gains over the last century, known as the Flynn Effect. Over the same period, the time society spends with screens has massively increased and intensified, for example, shorter and closer shots, increasing narrative complexity. In Movies on our Minds (2021), James Cutting suggests a potential bidirectional link between the two effects: generational increase in visual processing abilities led to movie makers increasing the demands their movies place on viewer cognition, which in turn has trained societal visual processing capacity. In this commentary we review the evidence for such a positive association. The evidence indicates that increasing screen time may be associated with faster visual processing but also a potentially decreased ability to process this information (i.e., reduced executive functions). Further, effects may be dependent on the type of screen experience (e.g., developmental appropriateness of content and delivery platform such as TikTok) and other environmental considerations (e.g., socioeconomic status, parenting), suggesting that the factors influencing our evolving media/mind niche may be more complex than originally proposed.

Contributor Notes

Tim J. Smith, BSc. Hons, PhD, is professor of cognitive psychology in the Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London and head of the Cognition in Naturalistic Environments (CINE) Lab. He studied artificial intelligence and psychology (joint honors) in Edinburgh (1997–2001) and then completed a PhD in the School of Informatics at Edinburgh in which he developed “An Attentional Theory of Continuity” (2006/2012). He applies empirical cognitive psychology methods to questions of film cognition and has published on the subject both in psychology and film journals. Email: tj.smith@bbk.ac.uk

Claire Essex BSc (Hons), MSc, is a PhD candidate at the Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London. She studied psychology (with honors) at Birkbeck, University of London (2013–2017) before completing an MSc in educational neuroscience at Birkbeck and the Institute of Education, University College London (2017/2018). She is interested in the impact of media content properties on children's developing attention and executive function skills. Specifically, her research examines how low-level visual features (i.e., flicker, motion, editing techniques) and higher-level semantic properties (i.e., indices of time and space; novel events such as impossible character transformations) combine to impact viewer cognition differentially at different stages of development.

Rachael Bedford, BA, PhD, is an associate professor in developmental psychology at the University of Bath and director of the Bath Babylab. She completed her undergraduate degree in Experimental Psychology at the University of Oxford (2005–2008) and her PhD at the Institute of Education, University of London (2009-2012). Her research is focused on how early risk and resilience factors in infancy influence developmental trajectories, including the role of screen time in cognitive development.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Projections

The Journal for Movies and Mind

  • AMPAS: Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. 2014. “Movies in Your Brain—The Science of Cinematic Perception.” Filmed July 29–30, hosted by Tim J. Smith, https://www.oscars.org/events/movies-your-brain-science-cinematicperception.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anderson, Joseph. 1998. The Reality of Illusion: An Ecological Approach to Cognitive Film Theory. Carbondale, IL: SIU Press.

  • Barr, Rachel, Alexis Lauricella, Elizabeth Zack, and Sandra L. Calvert. 2010. “Infant and Early Childhood Exposure to Adult-directed and Child-directed Television Programming: Relations with Cognitive Skills at Age Four.” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 56 (1): 2148.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bedford, Rachael, Irati R. Saez de Urabain, Celeste Cheung, Annette Karmiloff-Smith, and Tim J. Smith. 2016. “Toddlers’ Fine Motor Milestone Achievement Is Associated with Early Touchscreen Scrolling.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 16641078.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Berliner, Todd. 2017. Hollywood Aesthetic: Pleasure in American Cinema. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Berliner, Todd, and Dale J. Cohen. 2011. “The Illusion of Continuity: Active Perception and the Classical Editing System.” Journal of Film and Video 63 (1): 4463.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Berman, Marc G., John Jonides, and Stephen Kaplan. 2008. “The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting with Nature.” Psychological Science 19 (12): 12071212.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Berto, Rita, Stefano Massaccesi, and Margherita Pasini. 2008. “Do Eye Movements Measured across High and Low Fascination Photographs Differ? Addressing Kaplan's Fascination Hypothesis.” J. Environ. Psychol 28: 185191. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.11.004.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bordwell, David. 2006. The Way Hollywood Tells It: Story and Style in Modern Movies. Oakland: University of California Press.

  • Bourrier, Stefan C., Marc G. Berman, and James T. Enns. 2018. “Cognitive Strategies and Natural Environments Interact in Influencing Executive Function.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1248.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Britannica. 2022. Television in the United States—The Golden Age. https://www.britannica.com/art/television-in-the-United-States/The-late-Golden-Age (accessed 14 November 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carmi, Ran, and Laurent Itti. 2006. “Visual Causes versus Correlates of Attentional Selection in Dynamic Scenes.” Vision Research 46 (26): 43334345.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cutting, James E. 2021. Movies on our Minds: The Evolution of Cinematic Engagement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Cutting, James E. 2023. “Précis of Movies on Our Minds: The Evolution of Cinematic Engagement.” Projections 17 (1). This issue.

  • Daley, Tamara. C., Shannon E. Whaley, Marion D. Sigman, Michael P. Espinosa, and Charlotte Neumann. 2003. “IQ on the Rise: The Flynn Effect in Rural Kenyan Children.” Psychological Science 14 (3): 215219.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dutton, Edward, Dimitri van der Linden, and Richard Lynn. 2016. “The Negative Flynn Effect: A Systematic Literature Review.” Intelligence 59: 163169.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Essex, Clare, Teodora Gliga, Maninda Singh, and Tim J. Smith. 2022. “Understanding the Differential Impact of Children's TV on Executive Functions: A Narrative-processing Analysis.” Infant Behavior and Development 66: 101661.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Flory, Kate, Richard Milich, Elizabeth P. Lorch, Angela N. Hayden, Chandra Strange, and Richard Welsh. 2006. “Online Story Comprehension among Children with ADHD: Which core Deficits Are Involved?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 34 (6): 850862.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Flynn, James R. 1984. “The Mean IQ of Americans: Massive Gains 1932 to 1978.” Psychological Bulletin 95 (1): 29.

  • Flynn, James R. 1987. “Massive Gains in 14 Nations: What IQ Tests Really Measure.” Psychological Bulletin 101: 171191.

  • Flynn, James. 2007. What Is Intelligence? New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Flynn, James R. 2009. “Requiem for Nutrition as the Cause of IQ Gains: Raven's Gains in Britain 1938–2008.” Economics and Human Biology 7 (1): 1827.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Geist, Eugene A., and Marty Gibson. 2000. “The Effect of Network and Public Television Programs on Four and Five Year Olds Ability to Attend to Educational Tasks.” Journal of Instructional Psychology 27 (4): 250.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gibson, James J. 1979/2014. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition. London: Psychology Press.

  • Herrnstein, Richard J., and Charles Murray. 2010. The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hutson, John P., Joseph P. Magliano, Tim J. Smith, and Lester C. Loschky. 2021. “‘This Ticking Noise in My Head’: How Sound Design, Dialogue, Event Structure, and Viewer Working Memory Interact in the Comprehension of Touch of Evil (1958).” Projections 15 (1): 127.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ildirar Kirbas, Sermin, and Smith, Tim J. 2018. “How Infants Perceive Animated Films.” In Emotion in Animated Films, edited by Meike Uhrig. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaplan, Stephen. 1995. “The Restorative Benefits of Nature: Toward an Integrative Framework.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 15 (3): 169182.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kemp, Simon. 2022. Digital 2022: Time Spent Using Connected Tech Continues to Rise. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2022-time-spent-with-connected-tech (accessed 14 November 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kostyrka-Allchorne, Katarzyna, Nicholas R. Cooper, Anna Maria Gossmann, Katy J. Barber, and Andrew Simpson. 2017. “Differential Effects of Film on Preschool Children's Behaviour Dependent on Editing Pace.” Acta Paediatrica 106 (5): 831836.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kostyrka-Allchorne, Katarzyna, Nicholas R. Cooper, Steffan Kennett, Steffen Nestler, and Andrew Simpson. 2019. “The Short-term Effect of Video Editing Pace on Children's Inhibition and N2 and P3 ERP Components during Visual Go/No-Go Task.” Developmental neuropsychology 44 (4): 385396.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kostyrka-Allchorne, Katarzyna, Nicholas R. Cooper, and Andrew Simpson. 2017. “The Relationship between Television Exposure and Children's Cognition and Behaviour: A Systematic Review.” Developmental Review 44: 1958.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kostyrka-Allchorne, Katarzyna, Nicholas R. Cooper, and Andrew Simpson. 2019. “Disentangling the Effects of Video Pace and Story Realism on Children's Attention and Response Inhibition.” Cognitive Development 49: 94104.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kubey, Robert, and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2002. “Television Addiction Is No Mere Metaphor.” Scientific American 286 (2): 7480.

  • Leick, Karen. 2018. Parents, Media and Panic through the Years: Kids Those Days. New York: Springer.

  • Lillard, Angeline S., Marissa B. Drell, Eve M. Richey, Katherine Boguszewski, and Eric D. Smith. 2015. “Further Examination of the Immediate Impact of Television on Children's Executive Function.” Developmental Psychology 51 (6): 792.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lillard, Angeline S., Hui Li, and Katie Boguszewski. 2015. “Television and Children's Executive Function.” Advances in Child Development and Behavior 48: 219248.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lillard, Angeline S., and Jennifer Peterson. 2011. “The Immediate Impact of Different Types of Television on Young Children's Executive Function.” Pediatrics 128 (4): 644649.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Livingstone, Sonia. 2009. “Half a Century of Television in the Lives of Our Children.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 625 (1): 151163.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Loschky, Lester C., Adam M. Larson, Joseph P. Magliano, and Tim J. Smith. 2015. “What Would Jaws Do? The Tyranny of Film and the Relationship between Gaze and Higher-level Narrative Film Comprehension.” PloS one 10 (11): e0142474.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Loschky, Lester C., Adam M. Larson, Tim J. Smith, and Joseph P. Magliano. 2020. “The Scene Perception and Event Comprehension Theory (SPECT) Applied to Visual Narratives.” Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (1): 311351.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Messaris, Paul. 1994. Visual Literacy: Image, Mind and Reality. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

  • Mital, Parag K., Tim J. Smith, Robin L. Hill, and John M. Henderson. 2011. “Clustering of Gaze during Dynamic Scene Viewing Is Predicted by Motion.” Cognitive Computation 3 (1): 524.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Neisser, Ulric. 1997. “Rising Scores on Intelligence Tests: Test Scores Are Certainly Going Up All Over the World, but Whether Intelligence Itself Has Risen Remains Controversial.” American Scientist 85 (5): 440447.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nguyen, Lan, Karen Murphy, and Glenda Andrews. 2021. “A Game a Day Keeps Cognitive Decline Away? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Commercially-available Brain Training Programs in Healthy and Cognitively Impaired Older Adults.” Neuropsychology Review 32 (3): 130.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nikkelen, Sanne W. C., Patti M. Valkenburg, Mariette Huizinga, and Brad J. Bushman. 2014. “Media Use and ADHD-related Behaviors in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-analysis.” Developmental Psychology 50 (9): 2228.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OfCom. 2022. “Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report 2022.” https://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/media-literacy-research/childrens/children-and-parents-media-use-and-attitudes-report-2022 (accessed March 2022).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pautz, Michelle C. 2002. “The Decline in Average Weekly Cinema Attendance: 1930–2000.” Issues in Political Economy 11 (Summer): 5465.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Portugal, Ana M., Rachael Bedford, Celeste H. M. Cheung, Teodora Gliga, and Tim J. Smith (2020). “Saliency-driven Visual Search Performance in Toddlers with Low- vs High-touch Screen Use.” JAMA Pediatrics 175 (1): 9697.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Portugal, Ana Maria, Rachael Bedford, Celeste H. M. Cheung, Luke Mason, and Tim J. Smith. 2021. “Longitudinal Touchscreen Use across Early Development Is Associated with Faster Exogenous and Reduced Endogenous Attention Control.” Scientific Reports 11 (1): 112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Portugal, Ana Maria, Alexandra Hendry, Timothy John Smith, and Rachael Bedford. 2022. “Pre-schoolers with High Touchscreen Use Show Reduced Cognitive Flexibility.” doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107553.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Raven, Jean. 2003. “Raven Progressive Matrices.” In Handbook of Nonverbal Assessment, edited by R. Steve McCallum, 223237. Boston: Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ribner, Andrew, Caroline Fitzpatrick, and Clancy Blair. 2017. “Family Socioeconomic Status Moderates Associations between Television Viewing and School Readiness Skills.” Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics 38 (3): 233239.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rommel, Anna Sophie, Frühling Rijsdijk, Corina U. Greven, Philip Asherson, and Jonna Kuntsi. 2015. “A Longitudinal Twin Study of the Direction of Effects between ADHD Symptoms and IQ.” PloS one 10 (4): e0124357.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rothbart, Mary K., and Michael I. Posner. 2015. “The Developing Brain in a Multitasking World.” Developmental Review 35: 4263.

  • Salt, Barry. 1983. Film Style and Technology: History and Analysis. London: Starword.

  • Salt, Barry. 2006. Moving into Pictures: More on Film History, Style, and Analysis. London: Starword.

  • Schwan, Stefan, and Sermin Ildirar. 2010. “Watching Film for the First Time: How Adult Viewers Interpret Perceptual Discontinuities in Film.” Psychological Science 21 (7): 970976.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, Tim J. 2012a. “The Attentional Theory of Cinematic Continuity.” Projections 6 (1): 127.

  • Smith, Tim J. 2012b. “Extending AToCC: A Reply.” Projections 6 (1): 7178.

  • Smith, Tim J. 2013. “Watching You Watch Movies: Using Eye Tracking to Inform Film Theory.” In Psychocinematics: Exploring Cognition at the Movies, edited by Arthur P. Shimamura, 165191. New York: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, Tim J., and Daniel Levin, and James E. Cutting. 2012. “A Window on Reality: Perceiving Edited Moving Images.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 21 (2): 107113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, Tim J. and Parag K. Mital. 2013. “Attentional Synchrony and the Influence of Viewing Task on Gaze Behavior in Static and Dynamic Scenes.” Journal of Vision 13 (8). doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/13.8.16.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, Tim J. Parag K. Mital, and Tessa M. Dekker. 2021. “The Debate on Screen Time: An Empirical Case Study in Infant-directed Video.” In Taking Development Seriously: A Festschrift for Annette Karmiloff-Smith, edited by Michael S. C. Thomas, Denis Mareschal, and Victoria Knowland, 258279. New York: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Te Nijenhuis, Jan, Sun Hee Cho, Raegan Murphy, and Kun Ho Lee. 2012. “The Flynn Effect in Korea: Large Gains.” Personality and Individual Differences 53 (2): 147151.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Trahan, Lisa H., Karla K. Stuebing, Jack M. Fletcher, and Merrill Hiscock. 2014. “The Flynn Effect: A Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 140 (5): 1332.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2355 1325 266
Full Text Views 90 25 1
PDF Downloads 120 31 1