Comic Timing in Contemporary Slapstick Films

in Projections
Author:
Alaina P. Schempp Assistant professor, University of Birmingham, UK a.p.schempp@bham.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Alaina P. Schempp in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0239-6646
Restricted access

Abstract

A theory of comic timing in contemporary slapstick films based on the incongruity theory of humor is put forward. Comic timing is defined as perceived durational incongruity represented by two distinct types of rhythms: (1) in the standard perceived durational incongruity, the setup of the gag is durationally longer than the payoff; (2) in the non-standard perceived durational incongruity, extended duration functions as a self- referential tool for humor because it subverts the spectator's expectations for how long payoffs should be. The extended duration gag represents a metajoke about the nature of comic timing. Two additional factors of perceived durational incongruity are considered including when the setup and payoff are separated by a dramatic beat, which provides time for the spectator to understand the setup and make predictions about the outcome and when the setup is interrupted by the payoff, amounting to a non-threatening surprise that evokes humor.

Contributor Notes

Alaina P. Schempp is an assistant professor of film at the University of Birmingham in the UK. Her research interests include cognitive approaches to film, focusing on emotion and the perception of time in contemporary narratives, particularly comedy, horror, and suspense-thriller films. She is also a screenwriter. a.p.schempp@bham.ac.uk; ORCID: 0000-0003-0239-6646

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Projections

The Journal for Movies and Mind

  • Attardo, Salvatore, and Lucy Pickering. 2011. “Timing in the Performance of Jokes.” Humor 24 (2): 233250. https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMR.2011.015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bevis, Matthew. 2013. Comedy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Carroll, Noël. 1996. Theorizing the Moving Image. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Carroll, Noël. 2001. Beyond Aesthetics: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Carroll, Noël. 2005. “Humour.” In The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics, ed. Jerrold Levinson, 344365. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carroll, Noël. 2009. Comedy Incarnate: Buster Keaton, Physical Humor and Bodily Coping. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Carroll, Noël. 2010. Art in Three Dimensions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Carroll, Noël. 2014. Humour: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Feagin, Susan L. 1999. “Time and Timing.” In Passionate Views: Film, Cognition, and Emotion, ed. Carl Plantinga and Greg M. Smith, 168179. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grodal, Torben. 2014. “A General Theory of Comic Entertainment: Arousal, Appraisal, and the PECMA Flow.” In Cognitive Media Theory, ed. Ted Nannicelli and Paul Taberham, 175195. New York: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gunning, Tom. 2010. “Mechanisms of Laughter: The Devices of Slapstick.” In Slapstick Comedy, ed. Tom Paulus and Rob King, 137151. New York: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • King, Rob. 2017. Hokum! The Early Sound Slapstick Short and Depression-Era Mass Culture. Oakland: University of California Press.

  • Levinson, Jerrold. 2006. “The Concept of Humor.” Contemplating Art: Essays in Aesthetics, 389399. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McGraw, A. Peter, and Caleb Warren. 2010. “Benign Violations: Making Immoral Behavior Funny.” Psychological Science 21 (8): 11411149.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McGraw, A. Peter, and Caleb Warren. 2014. “Benign Violation Theory.” In Encyclopedia of Humor Studies, Vol. 2, ed. Salvatore Attardo, 7577. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. doi:.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morreall, John. 1983. Taking Laughter Seriously. Albany: State University of New York Press.

  • Morreall, John. 1987a. “Funny Ha-Ha Funny Strange, and Other Reactions to Incongruity.” In The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor, ed. John Morreall, 188207. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morreall, John. 1987b. “Humor and Emotion.” In The Philosophy of Laughter and Humor, ed. John Morreall, 212224. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morreall, John. 1998. “Comedy.” Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, online edn. Oxfordshire: Taylor and Francis. https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/thematic/comedy/v-1 (accessed 12 April 2024).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morreall, John. 2009. Comic Relief: A Comprehensive Philosophy of Humor. Malden, MA: Wiley- Blackwell.

  • Morreall, John. 2016. “Philosophy of Humor.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, online edn., edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/humor/ (accessed 12 April 2024).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Paulus, Tom, and Rob King. 2010. Slapstick Comedy. New York: Routledge.

  • Schempp, Alaina P. 2019. Poetics of Time and Timing in the Moving Image. Doctoral dissertation, University of Kent.

  • Suls, Jerry. 1972. “A Two-Stage Model for the Appreciation of Jokes and Cartoons: An Information Processing Analysis.” In The Psychology of Humor, ed. Jeffrey H. Goldstein and Paul E. McGhee, 81100. New York: Academic Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Suls, Jerry. 1983. “Cognitive Processes in Humour Appreciation.” In Handbook of Humour Research, Vol. 1: Basic Issues, ed. Paul E. McGhee and Jeffrey H. Goldstein, 3957. New York: Springer.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 305 305 69
Full Text Views 42 42 10
PDF Downloads 53 53 19