Man and Camera Become One

Steadicam, Embodiment, and Visual Conventions

in Projections
Author:
David Vanden Bossche PhD, University of Wisconsin–Madison, USA dvandenbossc@wisc.edu

Search for other papers by David Vanden Bossche in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7973-9603
Restricted access

Abstract

Since its introduction in 1976, the rhetoric surrounding Steadicam has emphasized the embodied nature of the technology. This article tests these claims against scholarly work on visual conventions as well as on embodiment and the related concept of Image Schemas as coined by Maarten Coëgnarts and Peter Kravanja. I will link both these approaches to the underlying idea of contingent human universals and how these undergird visual conventions. I will also turn to the field of evolutionary biology and epigenetic inheritance to add a (evolutionary) biological lens to these concepts. In doing so, I will argue for Steadicam's very special relationship with embodied camera movement and the specific new visual conventions it instigated.

Contributor Notes

David Vanden Bossche obtained a summa cum laude master's degree in art studies at the University of Ghent and a PhD from the University of Wisconsin–Madison. He wrote his master's thesis on documentary film and its influence on the early African cinema. His PhD study was devoted to the history of the Steadicam and its influence on film aesthetics, linking to the field of neurocinematics and interdisciplinary research from evolutionary biology and genetics. David has been a film critic for years and wrote articles for several printed and online publications and is currently editor-in-chief for the Enola online film magazine. dvandenbossc@wisc.edu; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7973-9603

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Projections

The Journal for Movies and Mind

  • Arnheim, Rudolf. 1966. Film as Art. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Bordwell, David. 1977. “Camera Movement and Cinematic Space.” Ciné-Tracts 1, no. 2 (Summer): 1926.

  • Bordwell, David. 1996. “Convention, Construction and Cinematic Vision.” In Post Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies, ed. David Bordwell and Noël Carroll, 87107. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bordwell, David. 2007. Poetics of Cinema, New York: Routledge.

  • Brown, Garrett. 1988. “Ancient History.” The Steadicam Letter 1, no. 3 (December).

  • Changeux, Pierre, and Stanislav Dehaene. 1993. “Neuronal Models of Cognitive Function.” In Brain Development and Cognition, ed. Mark H. Johnson, 363397. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coëgnarts, Maarten, and Peter Kravanja. 2015. “Embodied Visual Meaning in Film.” In Embodied Cognition and Cinema, ed. Maarten Coëgnarts and Peter Kravanja, 6380. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crary, Jonathan. 1988. Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • D'Aloia, Adriano. 2015. “The Character's Body and the Viewer: Cinematic Empathy and Embodied Simulation in the Film Experience.” In Embodied Cognition and Cinema, ed. Maarten Coëgnarts and Peter Kravanja, 187202. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Day, Jeremy, and Jennifer J. Tuscher. 2019. “Multigenerational Epigenetic Inheritance: One Step Forward, Two Generations Back.” Neurobiology of Disease 132. DOI.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104591.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dickson, David A., Jessica K. Paulus, Virginia Mensah, Janis Lem, Lorena Saavedra-Rodriguez, Adrienne Gentry, Kelly Pagidas, and Larry A. Feig. 2018. “Reduced Levels of miRNAs 449 and 34 in Sperm of Mice and Men Exposed to Early Life Stress.” Translational Psychiatry 8 (101). DOI: .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DiGiulio, Edmund. 1976. “Steadicam: A Revolutionary New Concept in Camera Stabilization.” American Cinematographer (July).

  • Ewing, Louise, and Sermin Ildirar. 2008. “Revisiting the Kuleshov Effect with First-Time Viewers.” Projections 12 (1). DOI: .

  • Ferrara, Serena. 2001. Steadicam: Techniques and Aesthetics. Oxford: Focal Press.

  • Gleber, Anke. 1999. The Art of Taking a Walk: Flanerie, Literature, and Film in Weimar Culture, Oxford: Princeton University Press.

  • Guerra, Michele. 2015. “Modes of Action at the Movies.” In Embodied Cognition and Cinema, ed. Maarten Coëgnarts and Peter Kravanja, 139151. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hasson, Uri, David Heeger, Barbara Knappmeyer, Ohad Landesman, Nava Rubin, and Ignacio Vallines. 2008. “Neurocinematics: The Neuroscience of Film.” Projections 2 (1): 126. DOI: .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hayball, Laurie, and Jerry Holway. 2013. The Steadicam Operator's Handbook, 2nd ed. New York and London: Focal Press.

  • Heard, Edith, and Robert A. Martienssen. 2014. “Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance: Myths and Mechanisms.” Leading Edge Review, Cell 157 (March). DOI.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.045.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Henderson, Scott. 1975. “The Cinema Products Story.” American Cinematographer (May).

  • Hickok, Gregory. 2014. The Myth of Mirror Neurons: The Real Neuroscience of Communication and Cognition. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

  • Ildirar, Sermin, and Stephan Schwann. 2010. “Watching Film for the First Time: How Adult Viewers Interpret Perceptual Discontinuities in Film.” Psychological Science 21 (June), 970976. DOI: .

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jablonka, Eva. 2016. “Cultural Epigenetics.” The Sociological Review Monograph 64 (1). DOI: .

  • Johnson, Mark, and George Lakoff. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, Carol E. 2020. “Epigenetic Inheritance.” Anthropology 410, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Fall 2020 Semester.

  • Manovich, Lev. 2010. “Digital Cinema and the History of a Moving Image.” In The Film Theory Reader: Debates and Arguments, ed. Marc Furstenau. New York: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Neidich, Warren. 2003. Blow-Up: Photography, Cinema and the Brain. New York: Distributed Art Publishers.

  • Onians, John. 2007. Neuroarthistory: From Aristotle and Pliny to Baxandall and Zeki. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Salt, Barry. (1983) 1997. Film Style and Technology: History & Analysis, 3rd ed. London: Starword.

  • Tikka, Pia, Andres Karjus, Elen Lotman, and Mehmet Burak Yilmaz. 2023. “An Embodiment of the Cinematographer: Emotional and Perceptual Responses to Different Camera Movement Techniques.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 17 (July). DOI:.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Turvey, Malcolm. 2020. “Mirror Neurons and Film Studies: A Cautionary Tale from a Serious Pessimist.” Projections 14 (3). DOI: .

  • Zeki, Semir. 1999. Inner Vision: An Exploration of Art and the Brain. New York: Oxford University Press.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 338 338 58
Full Text Views 37 37 6
PDF Downloads 50 50 12