EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region

A new space for a study of novel forms of diplomacy

in Regions and Cohesion
View More View Less
  • 1 United Nations University CRIS, Belgium zsime@cris.unu.edu
Restricted access

Abstract

The evolution of the EU multilevel governance unleashes new dynamics that hold a potential to contribute to the theory-building of paradiplomacy and honing of a more nuanced understanding what is to be understood with science diplomacy in the EU specific setting. When evaluated in the context of a broader body of literature on paradiplomacy and science diplomacy, new empirical examples from the EU macro-regional governance level, such as the discussed role of the Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg in coordinating a flagship of the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region called “Baltic Science Network,” should be treated with caution in terms of paying full attention to the distinct institutional environment in which a sub-national actor operates and pursues its initiatives.

Resumen

La evolución de la gobernanza multiniveles en la UE desencadena una nueva dinámica que podría contribuir a la teorización de la para-diplomacia y a una comprensión más matizada de diplomacia científica en el marco específico de la UE. Cuando se evalúan en el contexto general de la literatura sobre para-diplomacia y diplomacia científica, los nuevos ejemplos empíricos de gobernanza macro-regional europea, como el controvertido papel de la Ciudad Libre y Hanseática de Hamburgo en la coordinación del “Baltic Science Network” como parte de la estrategia europea para la región del Mar Báltico, deben tratarse con cautela con respecto a la atención al entorno institucional diferenciado en el que un agente sub-nacional opera y lleva a cabo sus iniciativas.

Résumé

L'évolution de la gouvernance multi-niveaux de l'UE génère une nouvelle dynamique qui pourrait contribuer à la théorisation de la paradiplomatie et à une compréhension plus nuancée du concept de diplomatie scientifique dans le cadre spécifique de l'UE. Lorsqu'ils sont évalués dans le contexte d'ensemble de la li.. érature sur la paradiplomatie et la diplomatie scientifique, les nouveaux exemples empiriques de gouvernance macro-régionale au sein de l'UE, tels que le rôle disputé de la Ville Libre et Hanséatique de Hambourg dans la coordination d'une stratégie de l'UE pour la région de la mer Baltique appelée “Baltic Science Network”, doivent être traités avec prudence pour ce qui est de l'a.. ention portée à l'environnement institutionnel distinct dans lequel un acteur sous-national opère et poursuit ses initiatives.

Contributor Notes

MS. ZANE ŠIME specializes in European Affairs. Her most recent research interests revolve around the EU science diplomacy toward Southern Neighborhood, the role of higher education and research cooperation in the EU-India relations, as well as multilevel governance of the Baltic Sea Region. Šime has obtained professional experience as an international civil servant as the secretariat of the Council of the Baltic Sea States and a national civil servant in Latvia, as well as an intern at UNU-CRIS. She is a graduate of KU Leuven (Belgium) and the University of Latvia (Latvia). E-mail: zsime@cris.unu.edu

Regions and Cohesion

Regiones y Cohesión / Régions et Cohésion

  • Adshead, M. (2002). Developing European regions? Comparative governance, policy networks and European integration. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Albrow, M., & Bradford, C. I. (2008). Regionalism in global governance. Realigning goals and leadership with cultures. In A. F. Cooper, C. W. Hughes, & P. De Lombaerde (Eds.), Regionalisation and global governance: The taming of globalisation? (pp. 230248). New York: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Alvarez, M. (2020). The rise of paradiplomacy in international relations. E-international relations. Retrieved from https://www.e-ir.info/2020/03/17/the-rise-of-paradiplomacy-in-international-relations/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balakrishnan, B. (2019). Changing dynamics of Indian foreign policy: The science and technology dimension. Ministry of External Affairs of India. Retrieved from https://www.mea.gov.in/distinguished-lectures-detail.htm?846.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bjola, C., & Kornprobst, M. (2013). Understanding international diplomacy: Theory, practice and ethics. Routledge.

  • Bursens, P., & Deforche, J. (2008). Going beyond paradiplomacy? An exploration based on the establishment of regional foreign policy powers in Belgium (No. D/2008/10106/014). Leuven. Retrieved from http://steunpuntbov.be/rapport/s2A0906004_deforche_2008_paradiplomacy.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cooper, A. F. (2008). Executive but expansive. The L20 as a project of “new” multilateralism and “new” regionalism. In A. F. Cooper, C. W. Hughes, & P. De Lombaerde (Eds.), Regionalisation and Global Governance: The Taming of Globalisation? (pp. 249264). New York: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Copeland, D. (2016). Opinion: Science diplomacy for the age of globalization. International institute for applied systems analysis. Retrieved from https://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/resources/publications/options/160606-Science-diplomacy-age-globalization.html.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cornago, N. (2010). On the normalization of sub-state diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 5(1–2), 1136. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191x-05010102.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dittmer, J. (2020). Distributed agency: Foreign policy sans MFA. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 15(1–2), 155164. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-15101087.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • European Commission. (2017). EU expands its research cooperation with Brazil and South Africa. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/index.cfm?pg = newsalert&year = 2017&na = na-130717.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fegebank, K. (2017). Hamburg´s Baltic Sea Region strategy for science and research turn into practical cooperation through Baltic Science Network. Baltic Rim Economies, 4, p. 12. Retrieved from https://sites.utu.fi/bre/wp-content/uploads/sites/227/2019/04/BRE_4_2017.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Graham, K. (2008) Regionalisation and responses to armed conflict, with special focus on conflict prevention and peacekeeping. In A. F. Cooper, C. W. Hughes, & P. De Lombaerde (Eds.), Regionalisation and global governance: The taming of globalisation? (pp. 159186). New York: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gram-Skjoldager, K. (2011). Bringing the diplomat back in: Elements of a new historical research agenda. EUI Working Papers (vol. 13). Florence. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2481918.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gstöhl, S. (2016). Theoretical approaches to the European neighbourhood policy. In S. Gstöhl & S. Schunz (Eds.), Theorizing the European neighbourhood policy (pp. 321). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315468693.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Häntsche, P. (2020). Regions and cities as foreign policy actors: Between reviving the past and implementing the contemporary. Connecting Ideas. Retrieved from http://cris.unu.edu/regions-and-cities-foreign-policy-actors-between-reviving-past-and-implementing-contemporary.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jackson, T. (2018). Paradiplomacy and political geography: The geopolitics of substate regional diplomacy. Geography Compass 12(2), 111. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12357.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaarbo, J., & Kenealy, D. (2017). Perspectives on small state security in the Scottish independence debate. In A. W. Neal (Ed.), Security in a small nation: Scotland, democracy, politics (pp. 2148). Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1sq5v42.6?refreqid=excelsiorpercent3Af3417a58f66f1987c924453ba98b6cc1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaltofen, C., & Acuto, M. (2018). Science diplomacy: Introduction to a boundary problem. Global Policy 9(S3), 814. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12621.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kamiński, T. (2019). What are the factors behind the successful EU-China cooperation on the subnational level? Case study of the Lodzkie region in Poland. Asia Europe Journal 17(2), 227242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-018-00532-0.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kleiner, J. (2008). The inertia of diplomacy. Diplomacy & Statecraft 19(2), 321349. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592290802096380.

  • Laverty, A., Chan, R., & Krasnodebska, M. (2020). Science diplomacy. USC Centre on Public Diplomacy. Retrieved from https://www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org/pdin_monitor_article/science-diplomacy.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lequesne, C. (2020). Ministries of foreign affairs: A crucial institution revisited. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 15(1–2), 112. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-bja10003.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mamadouh, V. (2016). Town twinning over the (ir)relevance of the paradiplomacy of European cities. In V. Mamadouh & A. van Wageningen (Eds.), Urban Europe (pp. 339346). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martínez, R. Z. (2017). Paradiplomacy in North America: Canadian provinces’ relations with their U.S. and Mexican counterparts. Norteamérica 12(2), 87109. https://doi.org/10.20999//nam.2017.b004.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McConnell, F., Moreau, T., & Dittmer, J. (2012). Geoforum mimicking state diplomacy: The legitimizing strategies of unofficial diplomacies. Geoforum, 43, 804814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.01.007.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitra, A. (2020). Resilience strategic S&T ties between countries are the only way to address climate change. The Indian Express. Retrieved from https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/science-technology-diplomacy-solar-energy-un-sdg-6195256/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Müller, J. M. (2019). Vienna as a global hub for science diplomacy. Nexus: The research blog of IIASA. Retrieved from https://blog.iiasa.ac.at/2019/12/23/vienna-as-a-global-hub-for-science-diplomacy/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Newhouse, J. (1997). Europe's rising regionalism. Foreign Affairs 76(1), 6784. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20047910?seq=1.

  • Plangger, M. (2018). Building something beautiful with stones: How regions adapt to, shape and transform the EU opportunity structure. Regional and Federal Studies 28(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2017.1354851.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ruffini, P. B. (2018). The intergovernmental panel on climate change and the science-diplomacy nexus. Global Policy 9(S3), 7377. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12588.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rüland, J. (2014). Interregionalism and International Relations: Reanimating an Obsolescent Research Agenda? In F. Baert, T. Scaramagli, & F. Söderbaum (Eds.), Intersecting Interregionalism: Regions, Global Governance and the EU (pp. 1535). Dordrecht: Springer.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rungius, C. (2018). State-of-the-Art Report: Summarizing literature on science diplomacy cases and concepts. S4D4C. Retrieved from https://www.s4d4c.eu/s4d4cs-state-of-the-art-report-on-science-diplomacy/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scott-Smith, G. (2018). Special Issue: The evolution of diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 14(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-018-0095-9.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Šime, Z. (2014). Human security in Latvia and the world: Awaiting a new comprehensive approach [original title in Latvian—Cilvēkdrošība Latvijā un pasaulē: jaunas visaptverošas pieejas gaidās]. Latvia's interests in the European Union [original title in Latvian—Latvijas intereses Eiropas Savienībā], 3, 4658. Retrieved from https://www.mfa.gov.lv/images/uploads/zurnali/makets2014 nr3_netam.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Šime, Z. (2017). Multi-level governance of innovation and smart specialisation. Smart Specialisation Platform. Retrieved from http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/-/multi-level-governance-of-innovation-and-smart-specialisation?inheritRedirect = true&redirect = percent2Fs3-in-baltic-sea-region.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Šime, Z. (2018). Council of the Baltic Sea States: The role of a sustainable and prosperous region in bringing science diplomacy forward (EL-CSID Working Paper No. 19). Brussels. Retrieved from https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/7dd3ca_6f7f6a0617764ae2a6f57922e3de0f29.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Šime, Z. (2020). The future of work from a macro-regional perspective macro-regional governance. Conference “Winter School ‘Four Dimensions of The Future of Work’” paper. (pp. 117). InGRID. Retrieved from http://www.inclusivegrowth.eu/files/Call-25/Sime-New-forms-of-work-1.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Šime, Z., & Legzdiņš, M. (2018). Research and higher education cooperation in the Baltic Sea Region. Latvia's interests in the European Union [original title in Latvian—Latvijas intereses Eiropas savienībā], 1, 4565. Retrieved from http://www.mfa.gov.lv/images/ES/Sabiedribas_Informesana_ES_jaut/ES_2018_1_netam.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Singh, J. P. (2018). UNESCO: Scientific humanism and its impact on multilateral diplomacy. Global Policy 9(S3), 5359. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12624.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, H. J. M. (2019). City networks and paradiplomacy as global public policy. In D. Stone & K. Moloney (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of global policy and transnational administration (pp. 121). Oxford Handbooks Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198758648.013.26.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Söderbaum, F. (2016). Rethinking regionalism. London: Palgrave.

  • Sunami, A. (2016). Japan's science and technology diplomacy. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment.org/2016/02/10/japan-s-science-and-technology-diplomacy-pub-63476.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sunami, A., Hamachi, T., & Kitaba, S. (2013). The rise of science and technology diplomacy in Japan. Science & Diplomacy 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/files/the_rise_of_science_and_technology_diplomacy_in_japan_science__diplomacy.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tatham, M., & Bauer, M. W. (2014). Support from below? Supranational institutions, regional élites and governance preferences. Journal of Public Policy 34(2), 237267. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X13000299.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tavares, R. (2016). Paradiplomacy: Cities and states as global players. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Tewari, F. (2017). Paradiplomacy in India : Evolution and operationalisation (ORF Occasional Paper No. 119). Retrieved from https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/ORF_OccasionalPaper_119_Paradiplomacy.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thakur, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (2008) Enhancing global governance through regional integration. In A. F. Cooper, C. W. Hughes, & P. De Lombaerde (Eds.), Regionalisation and global governance: The taming of globalisation? (pp. 1742). New York: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • The Royal Society. (2010). New frontiers in science diplomacy: Navigating the changing balance of power (RS Policy). London: The Royal Society. Retrieved from https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2010/4294969468.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Turekian, V. (2018). The evolution of science diplomacy. Global Policy 9(S3), 57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12622.

  • Van Langenhove, L. (2011). Building regions: The regionalization of the world order. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.

  • Van Langenhove, L. (2017). Tools for an EU science diplomacy. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/e668f8cf-e395-11e6-ad7c-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van Lierop, C. (2020). Implementation of macro-regional strategies (Briefing No. PE 608.717). Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2017/608717/EPRS_BRI(2017)608717_EN.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0-dowWkscLruk4VxedJsZe90HXnVIydg_l1OYcxlbRzj9y3CZ3Ow3vBLQ.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xifra, J., & McKie, D. (2012). From realpolitik to noopolitik: The public relations of (stateless) nations in an information age. Public Relations Review 38(5), 819824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.04.005.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1209 781 41
Full Text Views 51 36 0
PDF Downloads 84 66 1