Policentrismo y su relevancia para el análisis socioterritorial

Características, enfoques y dimensiones analíticas

in Regions and Cohesion
Author:
Gabriela De la Mora-De la Mora Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México gdlm@correo.crim.unam.mx

Search for other papers by Gabriela De la Mora-De la Mora in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3167/reco.2017.070106
Keywords:
análisis socio-territorial; gobernanza moderna; policentrismo; sistemas policéntricos; sistemas socio-ecológicos
Restricted access
USD  $22.00
Click here to view the full Terms and Conditions

All currencies in US Dollar

PayPal Logo

Resumen

Este es un artículo que busca contribuir a la comprensión de los sistemas policéntricos en contextos socio-territoriales, y su vínculo con la gobernanza moderna, en la que múltiples actores sociales interactúan a distintas escalas y en distintos niveles. Se discute el concepto de policentrismo, sus dimensiones, enfoques predominantes y supuestos sobre los que se funda su uso en el análisis socio-territorial. El texto subraya dos de los enfoques más influyentes en el desarrollo teórico–metodológico de los sistemas policéntricos: el europeo, clave en el desarrollo territorial y regional; y el estadounidense, centrado en el análisis del desarrollo institucional y la gobernanza de los socio-ecosistemas. También se destacan los supuestos de los sistemas policéntricos a fin de resolver integralmente problemas socio-territoriales a partir de interacciones multinivel, multiescala y multiactor. Finalmente se analiza su relación con la gobernanza moderna y se concluye que es importante continuar el estudio de los sistemas policéntricos.

Contributor Notes

GABRIELA DE LA MORA-DE LA MORA es Doctora en Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, con orientación en Sociología por el Posgrado en Ciencias Políticas y Sociales de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). Actualmente se desempeña como Investigadora Asociada C, de Tiempo Completo en el área de Estudios Socio-Ambientales del Centro Regional de Investigaciones Multidisciplinarias de la UNAM, México. Pertenece al Sistema Nacional de Investigadores Nivel 1.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Regions and Cohesion

Regiones y Cohesión / Régions et Cohésion

Cover Regions and Cohesion
Article Category:
Research Article
Page Count:
18
Keywords:
análisis socio-territorial; gobernanza moderna; policentrismo; sistemas policéntricos; sistemas socio-ecológicos
Print Publication Date:
01 Mar 2017
Online Publication Date:
01 Mar 2017
Copyright:
© Regions & Cohesion 2017

  • Aligica, P.D., & Tarko V. (2012). Polycentricity: From Polanyi to Ostrom and beyond. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 25(2), 237–262.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Andersson, K., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective. Policy sciences, 41(1), 71–93.

  • Buizer, M., Arts, B., & Kok, K. (2011). Governance, scale and the environment: The importance of recognizing knowledge claims in transdisciplinary arenas. Ecology and Society. Descargado de http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/volXX/issYY/artZZ/

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. (2005). Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the “urban” politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 14(1), 42–64.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Burger, M.J., & Meijers, E.J. (2012). Form follows function? Linking morphological and functional polycentricity. Urban Studies, 49(5), 1127–1149.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cano-Cardona, W., Van de Rijt, A., De Jon, W., & Pacheco, P. (2015). Aprovechamiento y mercados de la madera en el Norte amazónico de Bolivia. Revista Documento de Trabajo, 197. Descargado de http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/WPapers/WP197CIFOR.pdf2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Carpenter, S. (2016). Avoiding dysfunction: An analysis of the need for shared foundational concepts in polycentric governance. Proceedings of International Academic Conferences (No. 5306905). International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences 27th International Academic Conference, Prague. Descargado de http://www.iises.net/proceedings/27th-international-academic-conference-prague/front-page; doi:10.20472/IAC.2016.027.010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chaffin, B.C., Garmenstani, A.S., Gosnell, H. & Craig, R.K. (2016). Institutional networks and adaptive water governance in the Klamath River Basin. Science & Policy, 5.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Clement, F. (2010). Analyzing decentralized natural resource governance: Proposition for a “politicized” institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Science, 43, 129–156.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Davoudi, S. (2003). Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From an analytical tool to a normative agenda. European Planning Studies, 11(8).

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • De la Mora-De la Mora, G., & Montaño Salazar, R. (2016). ¿Hacia la construcción de una gobernanza ambiental participativa? Estudio de caso en el Área Metropolitana de Guadalajara. Intersticios Sociales, 11(6), 1–27. Descargado de http://www.intersticiossociales.com

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Finka, M., Kluvánková, T., & Ondrejička, V. (2015) Concept of polycentric governance for fuzzy soft spaces as a challenge for central European peripheral spaces: Understanding geographies of polarization and peripheralization. Part of the series New Geographies of Europe. Descargado de http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137415080_17

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour, 30, 441–473.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gruby, R. L., & Basurto, X. (2013). Multi-level governance for large marine commons: politics and polycentricity in Palau’s protected area network. Environmental Science & Policy, 33, 260–272.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hague, C., & Karryn, K. (2003). Polycentric scoping study. Edimburgo: School of the built environment Heriot-Watt University. Descargado de http://archive.northsearegion.eu/files/user/File/Events/Thematic%20Events/Polycentric%20Seminar/ScopingPoly.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hawkins, C.V., Kwon, S.W. & Baec, J. (2016). Balance between local economic development and environmental sustainability: A multi-level governance perspective. International Journal of Public Administration.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Howitt, R. (1998). Scale as relation: musical metaphors of geographical scale. Area30. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-4762.1998.tb00047.x/abstract.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kloosterman, R.C., & Sako, M. (2001). The polycentric urban region: towards a research agenda. Urban Studies, 38(4), 623–633. Descargado de www.researchgate.net/profile/Robert_Kloosterman/publication/275164947_The_Polycentric_Urban_Region_Towards_a_Research_Agenda/links/556b213408aefcb861d60d3d.pdf

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mansbridge, J. (2014). The role of the state in governing the commons. Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 8–10.

  • Mayntz, R. (2001). El estado y la sociedad civil en la gobernanza moderna. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, 21, 1–8.

  • McGinnis, M.D. (1999). Polycentric governance and development: Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McGinnis, M.D. (2011). Networks of adjacent action situations in polycentric governance. The Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 51–78. Descargado de http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00396.x/abstract?userIsAuthenticated=false&deniedAccessCustomisedMessage

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McGinnis, M.D., & Ostrom, E. (2012). Reflections on Vincent Ostrom, public administration, and polycentricity. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 15–25.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Meijers, E. (2007). Synergy in polycentric urban regions. Complementarity, organizing capacity and critical mass. Sustainable Urban Areas, Thesis Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands. Países Bajos: University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Meijers, E., & Sandberg, K. (2008). Reducing regional disparities by means of polycentric development: Panacea or placebo? Scienze Regionali Special Issue, 2(1), 71–96. Descargado de http://www.francoangeli.it/Riviste/Scheda_rivista.aspx?IDarticolo=33745

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ostrom, E. (2000). El gobierno de los bienes comunes. La evolución de las instituciones de acción colectiva. México: Crim-Unam, CFE.

  • Ostrom, E. (2010a).Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ostrom, E. (2010b). Polycentric journey. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci, 13, 1–23.

  • Ostrom, E. (2012). Nested externalities and polycentric institutions: Must we wait for global solutions to climate change before taking action at other scales? Economic Theory, 49(2), 353–369.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C.M., & Warren R. (1961). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Sciences Review, 55, 831–842.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Parr, J. (2004). The polycentric urban region: A closer inspection. Regional Studies, 38(3).

  • Rhodes, R.A.W. (2007). Understanding governance: The years on. Organization Studies, 28(08), 1243–1264.

  • Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Po-litical Science Review, 64(4), 1033–1053. Descargado de http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8935058&fileId=S0003055400133325

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schmitt, P., Volgmann, K., Münter, A., & Reardon, M. (2015). Unpacking polycentricity at the city-regional scale: Insights from Dusseldorf and Stockholm. European Journal of Spatial Development, 59. Descargado de http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A894779

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Taminiau, J., & Byrne, J. (2015). A polycentric response to the climate change challenge: Relying on creativity, innovation and Leadership. Position paper prepared for UNFCCC. Paris, France: University of Delaware.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Van Meeteren, M., Poorthuis, A., Derudder, B., & Witlox, F. (2015). Pacifying Babel’s Tower: A scientometric analysis of polycentricity in urban research. Urban Studies Journal.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Vasanen, A. (2012). Functional polycentricity: Examining metropolitan spatial structure through the connectivity of urban sub-centres. Urban Studies, 49(16), 3627–3644. Descargado de http://usj.sagepub.com/content/49/16/3627.short

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2214 969 248
Full Text Views 115 4 0
PDF Downloads 78 4 0