Purchase this article
USD $30.00
An Author Meets His Critics
Around Manuel A. Vásquez’s “More Than Belief: A Materialist Theory of Religion”
in Religion and Society
Author:
,
,
,
, and
Manuel A. Vásquez
Manuel A. Vásquez
University of Florida, Gainesville manuelv@ufl.edu
Search for other papers by Manuel A. Vásquez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Manuel A. Vásquez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abby Day
Abby Day
University of Kent a.f.day@kent.ac.uk
Search for other papers by Abby Day in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Abby Day in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Lionel Obadia
Lionel Obadia
University of Lyon, France lionel.obadia@univ-lyon2.fr
Search for other papers by Lionel Obadia in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lionel Obadia in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
David Chidester
David Chidester
University of Cape Town davidc@iafrica.com
Search for other papers by David Chidester in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David Chidester in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Chad E. Seales
Chad E. Seales
University of Texas at Austin seales@austin.utexas.edu
Search for other papers by Chad E. Seales in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chad E. Seales in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
USD $0.01
All currencies in US Dollar
Manuel Vásquez begins his book by describing university courses that frustrate his students by being text-based and divorced from real life. He rightly concludes that analyzing sacred texts does not alone explain lived religion and complex issues such as globalization, transnationalism, and hybrid identities. He is writing from a Religious Studies perspective that, as he says, sometimes suffers from an overly theological bias. Moves within the discipline to abandon ‘religion’ for something as equally diverse and difficult to pin down as ‘faith’ do not, he argues, take us any further, particularly because religion really matters to many people and therefore cannot be dismissed just because we scholars find it problematic. To adopt an approach that explores how religion is understood and lived by the people who practice it is, I agree, the most important task for people studying religion. If this serves as a wake-up call for people who still study religion as something, in Vásquez’s words, of angels rather than of people, then the book has done a great job.