Anthropologists have recently shown an increasing concern with secular formations. This exploratory article inquires into the secular formation of anthropology itself by initiating an examination of its relation to theology, deemed anthropology’s disciplinary Other. I argue for recognizing a complex relation, whereby anthropology in some ways forgets theology, in others sustains it, and in still others invites critique by it. Analyzing anthropology from its theological edges may reinvigorate awareness of its ethical dimensions as a secular enterprise, as well as help measure its distance from (or proximity to) dominant projects, such as the Enlightenment and the nation-state, which were crucial for its founding in the modern world. An anthropology critically curious about its inherited alienation from theological modes of reasoning may not only become better at investigating the possibilities that cultural forms can take, but also become aware of new forms that the discipline could itself take.
KHALED FURANI is an Associate Professor of Anthropology at Tel Aviv University. His research interests include social theory, modernity, language and literature, secularism, Palestine, and the history of anthropology. He has published articles in American Anthropologist, American Ethnologist, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Annual Review of Anthropology, Arab Studies Journal, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Theory and Event, Interventions, Boundary 2, and Postscripts and an ethnography, Silencing the Sea: Secular Rhythms in Palestinian Poetry (2012). His next book, forthcoming with Oxford University Press, examines the relationship between anthropology and theology. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
HorkheimerMax. 1996. “Reason Against Itself: Some Remarks on Enlightenment.” Pp. 359–367 in What Is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-Century Answers and Twentieth-Century Questions ed. JamesSchmidt. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Horkheimer, Max. 1996. “Reason Against Itself: Some Remarks on Enlightenment.” Pp. 359–367 in , ed. JamesSchmidt. Berkeley: University of California Press.)| false
MenesesEloiseLindyBackuesDavidBronkemaEricFlett and Benjamin L.Hartley. 2014. “Engaging the Religiously Committed Other: Anthropologists and Theologians in Dialogue.” Current Anthropology55 (1): 82–104.
Meneses, Eloise, LindyBackues, DavidBronkema, EricFlett, and Benjamin L.Hartley. 2014. “Engaging the Religiously Committed Other: Anthropologists and Theologians in Dialogue.” 55 (1): 82–104.)| false