Tantrists, non-monastic religious specialists of Tibetan Buddhism, constitute a diffuse, non-centralized form of clergy. In an area like Repkong, where they present a high demographic density, large-scale supra-local annual ritual gatherings of tantrists are virtually synonymous with, and crucial for, their collective existence. In the largest of these rituals, the ‘elders’ meeting’ is in effect an institutionalized procedure for evaluating the ritual performance, its conditions and effects, and, if necessary, for adjusting aspects of the ritual. At a recent meeting, the ‘elders’ decided to abandon a powerful and valued but violent and problematical component of the ritual, due to its potential detrimental effects on the fabric of social relations on which the ritual depends for its continued existence. Thus, a highly scripted, ‘liturgy-centered’ ritual (per Atkinson) can be adapted to the social context. The specialists of these textual rituals demonstrate collectively an expertise that extends into the sociological dynamics surrounding the ritual.
NICOLAS SIHLE is a Researcher at the Centre for Himalayan Studies, a research unit of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS). His first book, Buddhist Rituals of Power and Violence: The Figure of the Tibetan Tantrist (2013, in French), is an ethnography of Tibetan tantrists, non-monastic specialists of tantric rituals. His current research focuses on the renowned communities of tantrists in northeast Tibet (Qinghai) and on collaborative work in the comparative anthropology of Buddhism. He recently co-edited a special issue of Religion Compass on the Buddhist gift (2015) and a special section of Religion and Society on the anthropology of Buddhism (2017). E-mail: email@example.com
CantwellCathy and RobertMayer. 2002. “Note on Transliteration: ‘Not Wylie’ Conventions.” Rig ‘dzin Tshe dbang nor bu edition of the rNying ma’i rgyud ‘bum. http://www.tbrc.org/ngb/csac/NGB/Doc/NoteTransliteration.xml.html.
GermanoDavid and NicolasTournadre. 2003. “THL Simplified Phonetic Transcription of Standard Tibetan.” Tibetan and Himalayan Library.http://www.thlib.org/reference/transliteration/#!essay=/thl/phonetics/ (accessed 18 April 2014).
GoldsteinMelvyn C.1998. “The Revival of Monastic Life in Drepung Monastery.” In Buddhism in Contemporary Tibet: Religious Revival and Cultural Identity ed. Melvyn C.Goldstein and Matthew T.Kapstein15–52. Berkeley: University of California Press.
HyytiainenTiina. 2011. “Repkong Tantric Practitioners and Their Environment: Observing the Vow of Not Taking Life.” In Himalayan Nature: Representations and Reality ed. ErikaSandman and Riika J.Virtanen17–37. Helsinki: Societas Orientalis Fennica; WS Bookwell Oy.
PlatvoetJan. 1995. “Ritual in Plural and Pluralist Societies: Instruments for Analysis.” In Pluralism and Identity: Studies in Ritual Behaviour ed. JanPlatvoet and Karelvan der Toorn25–51. Leiden: Brill.
SihleNicolas. 2009a. “The Ala and Ngakpa Priestly Traditions of Nyemo (Central Tibet): Hybridity and Hierarchy.” In Buddhism Beyond the Monastery: Tantric Practices and Their Performers in Tibet and the Himalayas ed. SarahJacoby and AntonioTerrone145–162. Leiden: Brill.
SihleNicolas. 2009b. “Written Texts at the Juncture of the Local and the Global: Some Anthropological Considerations on a Local Corpus of Tantric Ritual Manuals (Lower Mustang, Nepal).” In Tibetan Ritual ed. JoseIgnacio Cabezon35–52. New York: Oxford University Press.
SihleNicolas. 2013a. “Money, Butter and Religion: Remarks on Participation in the Large-Scale Collective Rituals of the Rep kong Tantrists.” In Monastic and Lay Traditions in North-Eastern Tibet ed. YangdonDhondupUlrichPagel and GeoffreySamuel165–185. Leiden: Brill.
SihleNicolas. 2016. “The Emergence of a New Category of Tibetan Buddhist Religious Actors: Ngakma (Female Non-monastic Tantric Practitioners) in Repkong.” Paper presented at the international workshop “Buddhism Humanities and Ethnographic Methods”University of Vermont.