What can we learn from a ‘liar’ and a ‘madman’? Serendipity and double commitment during fieldwork
in Social Anthropology/Anthropologie sociale
Author:
Stefan Le Courant
Stefan Le Courant
Maison de l'archéologie et de l'ethnologie René‐Ginouvès stefan.le‐courant@mae.u‐paris10.fr
Search for other papers by Stefan Le Courant in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefan Le Courant in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
All currencies in US Dollar
In order to do my PhD fieldwork among undocumented migrants in a detention centre, I had to become a volunteer for an NGO providing legal assistance. In this paper I examine the effect of this double commitment through the study of two figures: a ‘liar’ and a ‘madman’. I question the grounds upon which field anthropological practice is based, namely, the ideas of long‐term fieldwork and serendipity. I hypothesise that anthropological knowledge is constructed in the successive oscillations between various positions and points of view on the field and not in the quest for the right distance from the subject under scrutiny.