Sartre’s Literary Phenomenology

in Sartre Studies International
Andrew Inkpin University of Melbourne

Search for other papers by Andrew Inkpin in
Current site
Google Scholar
Restricted access


This article focuses on the relation between philosophy and literature in early Sartre, showing how his literary writing can be seen as philosophically significant by interpreting Sartre as practising a variant of phenomenological method. I first clarify Sartre’s approach to phenomenological method by comparing and contrasting it with Husserl’s. Despite agreeing that philosophy is a reflective descriptive study of essences, Sartre sees no use for phenomenological reduction and free variation. I then consider the philosophical function of Sartre’s literary works, arguing that, although these cannot reliably convey philosophical theories, their significance lies in describing concrete situations that ground reflective theoretical concepts. However, this grounding function can be understood only if Sartre is seen as realising Husserl’s phenomenological method – including phenomenological reduction and free variation – more fully than he acknowledges. Finally, I address two challenges to my view and briefly assess the value of literary phenomenology as a philosophical method.

Contributor Notes

Andrew Inkpin is a lecturer in contemporary European philosophy at the University of Melbourne. His research focuses mainly on phenomenological approaches to meaning, particularly in language and pictorial representation. Recent publications include Disclosing the World: On the Phenomenology of Language (MIT Press, 2016).

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Sartre Studies International

An Interdisciplinary Journal of Existentialism and Contemporary Culture


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 947 315 46
Full Text Views 36 1 0
PDF Downloads 29 2 1