Monstrous Masses

The Human Body as Raw Material

in Screen Bodies
John Marmysz College of Marin

Search for other papers by John Marmysz in
Current site
Google Scholar
Restricted access


This article investigates the varied reactions of audiences to cinematic depictions of the human body as objectified raw material. The investigation proceeds, first, by explicating an ontological distinction between being-in-itself and being-for-itself, which in turn allows for a clarification of the processes involved in the objectification of one human being by another. The article then argues that in films where depictions of bodily objectification are pushed to an extreme—such as The Human Centipede, Nymphomaniac, and Videodrome—a potentially positive, empathic potential is unlocked in audiences. Rather than simply resulting in the humilation of human characters, such films encourage audiences to experience a kind of sympathy for the characters that is related to, but not distinct from, other horrific, humorous, and erotic feelings. The article concludes that the objectification of human bodies in film is both unavoidable and a potentially positive moral exercise.

Contributor Notes

John Marmysz, PhD, is a professor of philosophy at the College of Marin. His research interests focus on the issue of nihilism and its various cultural manifestations. He is the author of Laughing at Nothing: Humor as a Response to Nihilism (State University of New York Press, 2003), The Path of Philosophy: Truth, Wonder and Distress (Wadsworth, 2012), The Nihilist: A Philosophical Novel (No Frills Buffalo, 2015) and is co-editor (with Scott Lukas) of Fear, Cultural Anxiety and Transformation: Horror, Science Fiction and Fantasy Films Remade (Lexington Books, 2009). He has served as an NEH fellow and is a recipient of the SUNY Chancellor’s Award for Excellence in Scholarship and Creative Activities.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Screen Bodies

The Journal of Embodiment, Media Arts, and Technology

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 2002. Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive. New York: Zone Books.

  • Arendt, Hannah. 1976. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt.

  • Aristotle. 1941. “Poetics.” Pp. 14551487 in The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. Richard McKeon. New York: Random House.

  • Bordo, Susan. 1993. Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Bordo, Susan. 1999. The Male Body: A New Look at Men in Public and in Private. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

  • Bradshaw, Peter. 2010. “The Human Centipede (First Sequence).” Guardian, 19 August. (accessed 7 December 2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brunner, Elizabeth A. 2003. “Impotence, Nostalgia and Objectification: Patriarchal Visual Rhetoric to Contain WomenVisual Culture and Gender volume 8: 2845.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carroll, Noël. 1990. The Philosophy of Horror: Or Paradoxes of the Heart. New York: Routledge.

  • Carroll, Noël. 2003. Engaging the Moving Image. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

  • De Beauvoir, Simone. 1989. The Second Sex. New York: Vintage Books.

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 2013a. Cinema I: The Movement Image. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 2013b. Cinema II: The Time-Image. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

  • Ebert, Roger. 2010. “The Human Centipede.” (accessed 7 December 2104).

  • Hegel, G.W.F. 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. A.V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Indie London. 2010. “The Human Centipede: Tom Six Interview.” (accessed 7 December 2014).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaplan, E. Ann. 1983. Women and Film: Both Sides of the Camera. New York: Routledge.

  • Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Trans. Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Marks, Laura. 2000. The Skin of the Film: Intercultural Cinema, Embodiment, and the Senses. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

  • Marmysz, John. 2003. Laughing at Nothing: Humor as a Response to Nihilism. Albany: State University of New York Press.

  • Moreall, John. 1983. Taking Laughter Seriously. Albany: State University of New York Press.

  • Mulvey, Laura. 2009. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Pp. 711722 in Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings, eds. Leo Braudy and Marshall Cohen. New York: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Plato. 1997. “Phaedo.” Pp. 49100 in Plato: Complete Works, ed. John M. Cooper. Indianapolis: Hackett.

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1992. Being and Nothingness. Trans. Hazel Barnes. New York: Washington Square Press.

  • Schatz, Thomas. 2004. Hollywood: Crit Concepts V4. New York: Routledge.

  • Studlar, Gaylyn. 1984. “Masochism and the Perverse Pleasures of the CinemaQuarterly Review of Film Studies 9(4): 267282.

  • Tasker, Yvonne. 1993. Spectacular Bodies: Gender, Genre and the Action Cinema. New York: Routledge.

  • Williams, Linda. 1999. Hardcore: Power, Pleasure, and the Frenzy of the Visible. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Yancy, George. 2008. Black Bodies, White Gazes: The Continuing Significance of Race. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

  • Zizek, Slavoj. 2013. Enjoy Your Symptom!: Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and Out. New York: Routledge.

  • Cronenberg, David. 1983. Videodrome. USA.

  • Six, Tom. 2009. The Human Centipede (First Sequence). USA.

  • Six, Tom. 2011. The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence). Australia.

  • Six, Tom. 2015. The Human Centipede III (Final Sequence). USA.

  • Trier, Lars von. 2013. Nymphomaniac: Vol. I. USA.

  • Trier, Lars von. 2013. Nymphomaniac: Vol. II. USA.


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 538 365 10
Full Text Views 24 6 3
PDF Downloads 20 4 1