Epilogue

Toing and Froing the Social

in Social Analysis
Author:
Don Handelman Hebrew University of Jerusalem mshand@mscc.huji.ac.il

Search for other papers by Don Handelman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Understandably, one would think, the social is the heartland of ritual studies. What is ritual, if not the Durkheimian effervescence of the social? Still, a number of the essays in this volume move towards the borders of the social. Perhaps this has occurred because the contributors were asked to think of ritual in its own right, thereby freeing them from the so deeply embedded anthropological stricture that ritual is social because it must be attached to, relate to, or service some group. Ritual is created by groups and expressive of groups, otherwise it is insignificant. This complicity of ritual and groupness implicitly demands that rite have meaning or function for the social, the raison d’être of ritual’s existence. Thus, the structures, dynamics, and processes of ritual are immediately oriented to the social. Rarely considered is that taking this tack eliminates other possibilities in which thinking on ritual ignores the borders of the social.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Social Analysis

The International Journal of Anthropology

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 82 38 8
Full Text Views 5 0 0
PDF Downloads 10 1 0