Global Warring Today

in Social Analysis
Author:
Stephen Reyna Max Planck Institute of Social Anthropology stephen.reyna@manchester.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Stephen Reyna in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Mary Kaldor has influentially argued that understanding violence in the current period of globalization depends upon the recognition that this is an era of `new wars'. This article critiques that view and in so doing proposes a global warring hypothesis to help explain current US military violence. The argument is formulated as follows. First, the concept of new wars is critiqued, and it is suggested that local, global, and world warring are the varieties of warfare that predominate in the current conjuncture and, hence, require analysis. Second, the global warring concept is introduced and is utilized in a global warring hypothesis, a generalization of which has the virtue of explaining the wars of George W. Bush's regime. Third, evidence is provided that supports the hypothesis.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Social Analysis

The International Journal of Anthropology

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 130 71 1
Full Text Views 11 1 0
PDF Downloads 16 3 0