The Place of Theory

Rights, Networks, and Ethnographic Comparison

in Social Analysis
Author:
Harri Englund University of Cambridge hme25@cam.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Harri Englund in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Thomas Yarrow Durham University t.g.yarrow@durham.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Thomas Yarrow in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

The relationship between theory and place has remained a central problem for the discipline of anthropology. Focusing on debates around the concepts of human rights and networks, specifically as these traverse African and Melanesian contexts, this article highlights how novel ideas emerge through sustained comparison across different regions. Rather than understanding places as sources of theories to be applied to other contexts, we argue that anthropologists need to recognize how new concepts are generated through reflexive comparison across different regions. This analysis leads us to question a widespread propensity to understand places as the sine qua non of anthropological theory, proposing instead that place emerges retrospectively as an artifact of comparison. We conclude that while it is therefore necessary to acknowledge the analytic construction of Africa and its sub-regions, there remain compelling reasons to recognize its analytic utility.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Social Analysis

The International Journal of Anthropology

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1229 808 31
Full Text Views 35 4 1
PDF Downloads 51 9 1