The Politics of Ritual Form(ation) in Contemporary Mongolia

in Social Analysis
View More View Less
  • 1 Columbia University eht24@cam.ac.uk
Restricted access

Engaging Humphrey and Laidlaw’s ‘archetypal actions of ritual’, this article explores the thing-like and seemingly externally derived quality of ritualized action in ‘alternative’ medical settings in Mongolia. The cultural rupture of the Soviet era presents a case study in which the continuity of ritualized action cannot be assumed in ritual making during the post-1990 (re)construction of national culture. Elements derived from shared public knowledge have become constituted in ritual more recently and frequently than can be accounted for by an aperture-like model, where previously external elements gradually filtered in. Building on regional literature concerning loss of ritual form and recent syncretic innovation, I suggest that the affordances of form—mobility, iterability, and malleability—capture the politics inherent in the reordering of associations in the making of ritual.

Social Analysis

The International Journal of Anthropology

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 16 16 3
Full Text Views 12 12 3
PDF Downloads 22 22 5