Dis/working with Diagrams

How Genealogies and Maps Obscure Nanoscale Worlds (a Hunter-Gatherer Case)

in Social Analysis
Author:
Nurit Bird-David PhD, University of Cambridge, England nurit.birddavid@gmail.com

Search for other papers by Nurit Bird-David in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Standard diagrammatic tools in ethnographies, locational maps, and kinship trees are supposed to help make fieldwork and its findings intelligible to readers. This article explores how, to the contrary, they obscure locals’ lived worlds and the fieldwork process when they are used cross-culturally and cross-scalarly in studies of minuscule indigenous societies, anthropology's traditional study subject. I draw on my experience of producing and using these visuals, from fieldwork through to writing ethnography, in my work with foragers who live in South India in order to show the effect of these diagrammatic tools on our understanding of nanoscale communities and their intimate worlds.

Contributor Notes

Nurit Bird-David received her PhD in Social Anthropology from the University of Cambridge and is a Professor of Cultural Anthropology at the University of Haifa. She is the author of Us, Relatives: Scaling and Plural Life in a Forager World (2017), and dozens of her articles have appeared in leading journals. Her research interests include hunter-gatherers’ environmental perceptions and ontologies, shifting scales of practice and imagination, alternative notions of nation and community, neo-liberal notions of personhood, home, and security, and the new algorithmic-based ‘sharing economy’. E-mail: nurit.birddavid@gmail.com

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Social Analysis

The International Journal of Anthropology

  • Alford, Richard D. 1988. Naming and Identity: A Cross-Cultural Study of Personal Naming Practices. New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.

  • Alia, Valerie. 2007. Names and Nunavut: Culture and Identity in Arctic Canada. New York: Berghahn Books.

  • Anderson, Benedict. (1983) 2006. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso.

  • Banks, Marcus. 2001. Visual Methods in Social Research. London: Sage.

  • Barnard, Alan, and Anthony Good. 1984. Research Practices in the Study of Kinship. London: Academic Press.

  • Barnes, John A. 1967. “Genealogies.” In The Craft of Social Anthropology, ed. A. L. Epstein, 101128. London: Transaction Publishers.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bird, Nurit. 1983. “Wage-Gathering: Socio-Economic Change and the Case of the Naiken of South India.” In Rural South Asia: Linkages, Change and Development, ed. Peter Robb, 5789. London: Curzon Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bird-David, Nurit. 1994. “Sociality and Immediacy: Or, Past and Present Conversations on Bands.” Man (n.s.) 29 (3): 583603.

  • Bird-David, Nurit. 1999. “‘Animism’ Revisited: Personhood, Environment, and Relational Epistemology.” Current Anthropology 40 (S1): S67S91.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bird-David, Nurit. 2017a. “Before Nation: Scale-Blind Anthropology and Foragers’ Worlds of Relatives.” Current Anthropology 58 (2): 209226.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bird-David, Nurit. 2017b. Us, Relatives: Scaling and Plural Life in a Forager World. Oakland: University of California Press.

  • Bird-David, Nurit. 2018a. “Persons or Relatives? Animistic Scales of Practice and Imagination.” In Rethinking Relations and Animism: Personhood and Materiality, ed. Miguel Astor-Aguilera and Graham Harvey, 2534. London: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bird-David, Nurit. 2018b. “Size Matters! The Scalability of Modern Hunter-Gatherer Animism.” Quaternary International 464: 305314.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bird-David, Nurit. 2019. “Where Have All the Kin Gone? On Hunter-Gatherers’ Sharing, Kinship and Scale.” In Towards a Broader View of Hunter-Gatherer Sharing, ed. Noa Lavi and David E. Friesem, 1524. Cambridge: MacDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bodenhorn, Barbara. 2000. “‘He Used to Be My Relative’: Exploring the Bases of Relatedness among Iñupiat of Northern Alaska.” In Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship, ed. Janet Carsten, 128148. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bodley, John H. 1996. Anthropology and Contemporary Human Problems. 3rd ed. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.

  • Bonelli, Cristóbal. 2015. “To See That Which Cannot Be Seen: Ontological Differences and Public Health Policies in Southern Chile.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (n.s.) 21 (4): 872891.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bouquet, Mary. 1996. “Family Trees and Their Affinities: The Visual Imperative of the Genealogical Diagram.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2 (1): 4366.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bruck, Gabriele vom, and Barbara Bodenhorn, eds. 2006. The Anthropology of Names and Naming. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Eddy, Matthew D. 2014. “How to See a Diagram: A Visual Anthropology of Chemical Affinity.” Osiris 29 (1): 178196.

  • Gell, Alfred. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon.

  • Grimshaw, Anna. 2001. The Ethnographer's Eye: Ways of Seeing in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hallam, Elizabeth. 2016. Anatomy Museum: Death and the Body Displayed. London: Reaktion Books.

  • Ingold, Tim. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.

  • Ingold, Tim. 2007. Lines: A Brief History. London: Routledge.

  • Kelly, Robert L. 1995. The Foraging Spectrum: Diversity in Hunter-Gatherer Lifeways. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

  • Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Lee, Richard B., and Irven DeVore, eds. 1968. Man the Hunter. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude. (1949) 1969. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Ed. Rodney Needham; trans. James H. Bell, John R. von Sturmer, and Rodney Needham. Boston: Beacon Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lynteris, Christos. 2017. “Zoonotic Diagrams: Mastering and Unsettling Human-Animal Relations.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 23 (3): 463485.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marshall, Mac, ed. 1979. Siblingship in Oceania: Studies in the Meaning of Kin Relations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

  • Mason, Alan. 1997. “The Sibling Principle in Oronao’ Residence.” Ethnology 36 (4): 351366.

  • Myers, Fred R. 1986. Pintupi Country, Pintupi Self: Sentiment, Place, and Politics among Western Desert Aborigines. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nuckolls, Charles W., ed. 1993. Siblings in South Asia: Brothers and Sisters in Cultural Context. New York: Guilford Press.

  • Nuttall, Mark. 2000. “Choosing Kin: Sharing and Subsistence in a Greenlandic Hunting Community.” In Dividends of Kinship: Meanings and Uses of Social Relatedness, ed. Peter P. Schweitzer, 3360. London: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Partridge, Tristan. 2014. “Diagrams in Anthropology: Lines and Interactions.” Life Off the Grid. https://anthropologyoffthegrid.wordpress.com/ethnograms/diagrams-in-anthropology.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peterson, Nicolas. 1993. “Demand Sharing: Reciprocity and the Pressure for Generosity among Foragers.” American Anthropologist (n.s.) 95 (4): 860874.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rivers, W. H. R. (1910) 1968. “The Genealogical Method of Anthropological Enquiry.” In Kinship and Social Organization, A. Forge, ed, 97113. London: Athlone Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sahlins, Marshall. 2013. What Kinship Is—And Is Not. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Smith, Eric A., and Mark Wishnie. 2000. “Conservation and Subsistence in Small-Scale Societies.” Annual Review of Anthropology 29: 493524.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Strathern, Marilyn. 1991. Partial Connections. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

  • Strathern, Marilyn. 1992a. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Strathern, Marilyn. 1992b. “Parts and Wholes: Refiguring Relationships in a Post-Plural World.” In Conceptualizing Society, ed. Adam Kuper, 75104. London: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Strathern, Marilyn. 1995. The Relation: Issues in Complexity and Scale. Cambridge: Prickly Pear Press.

  • Tsing, Anna L. 2012. “On Nonscalability: The Living World Is Not Amenable to Precision-Nested Scales.” Common Knowledge 18 (3): 505524.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Turnbull, David. 1991. Mapping the World in the Mind: An Investigation of the Unwritten Knowledge of the Micronesian Navigators. Victoria: Deakin University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Widlok, Thomas. 2000. “Names That Escape the State: Hai//om Naming Practices versus Domination and Isolation.” In Hunters and Gatherers in the Modern World, ed. Peter P. Schweitzer, Megan Biesele, and Robert K. Hitchcock, 361379. New York: Berghahn Books.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Widlok, Thomas. 2013. “Sharing: Allowing Others to Take What Is Valued.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3 (2): 1131.

  • Widlok, Thomas. 2017. Anthropology and the Economy of Sharing: Critical Topics in Contemporary Anthropology. London: Routledge.

  • Wilson, Ara. 2018. “Visual Kinship.” History of Anthropology Newsletter 42, 24 July. http://histanthro.org/clio/visual-kinship/.

  • Xiang, Biao. 2013. “Multi-scalar Ethnography: An Approach for Critical Engagement with Migration and Social Change.” Ethnography 14 (3): 282299.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1358 722 52
Full Text Views 73 2 0
PDF Downloads 107 2 0