On Visual Coherence and Visual Excess

Writing, Diagrams, and Anthropological Form

in Social Analysis
Author:
Matei Candea Reader, University of Cambridge, England mc288@cam.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Matei Candea in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This article reflects on the power and dangers of diagrams as a mode of anthropological exposition, comparing this particular form of non-text to the brief dalliance of mid-century anthropology with algebraic and logical formulae. It has been claimed that diagrams, like formulae, are clearer, simpler, or less deceptive than textual argument. By contrast, this article argues that diagrams are just as slippery and tricky as words, but that images and words slip and slide in different ways. Holding both diagrams and words together when building an argument enables not only a specific kind of rigor, but also moments of unexpected theoretical invention. This technique of holding together contrasting heuristics scales up as a productive epistemic device for anthropology more broadly.

Contributor Notes

Matei Candea is a Reader in Social Anthropology at the University of Cambridge. He is the author of Corsican Fragments (2010) and Comparison in Anthropology: The Impossible Method (2018), and the editor of The Social after Gabriel Tarde (2010) and Schools and Styles of Anthropological Theory (2018). He has worked on alterity and belonging in Corsica and on human-animal relations in biological science. He is currently the Principal Investigator of an ERC-funded research project comparing the ethics, epistemics, and heuristics of freedom of speech in Europe. E-mail: mc288@cam.ac.uk

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Social Analysis

The International Journal of Anthropology

  • Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Barnes, J. A. 1962. “Rethinking and Rejoining: Leach, Fortes and Filiation.” Journal of the Polynesian Society 71 (4): 403410.

  • Bouquet, Mary. 1996. “Family Trees and Their Affinities: The Visual Imperative of the Genealogical Diagram.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2 (1): 4366.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Candea, Matei. 2016. “De deux modalités de la comparaison en anthropologie sociale” [On two modalities of comparison in social anthropology]. L'Homme 218: 183218.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Candea, Matei. 2018. Comparison in Anthropology: The Impossible Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Carsten, Janet. 2000. “Introduction: Cultures of Relatedness.” In Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship, ed. Janet Carsten, 136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, Peter Pin-Shan. 1989. “The Entity-Relationship Model: Towards a Unified View of Data.” In Readings in Artificial Intelligence and Databases, ed. John Mylopoulos and Michael L. Brodie, 98111. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clifford, James, and George Marcus, eds. 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Corsín Jiménez, Alberto. 2011. “Daribi Kinship at Perpendicular Angles: A Trompe l'Oeil Anthropology.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 1 (1): 141157.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Daston, Lorraine. 1995. “The Moral Economy of Science.” Osiris 10: 224.

  • Dumont, Louis. (1971) 2006. An Introduction to Two Theories of Social Anthropology: Descent Groups and Marriage Alliance. Ed. and trans. Robert Parkin. New York: Berghahn Books.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1950. “Social Anthropology: Past and Present: The Marett Lecture, 1950.” Man 50: 118124.

  • Foks, Freddy. 2019. “Constructing the Field in Colonial Africa: Power, Persona and Paper Tools.” Paper presented at the Senior Seminar, 25 January, Department of Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gell, Alfred. 1999. The Art of Anthropology: Essays and Diagrams. Ed. Eric Hirsch. Oxford: Berg.

  • Goyet, Francis. 2014. “Comparison.” In Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon, ed. Barbara Cassin, Emily Apter, Jacques Lezra, and Michael Wood; trans. Steven Rendall, Christian Hubert, Jeffrey Mehlman, Nathanael Stein, and Michael Syrotinski, 159164. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holbraad, Martin. 2012. Truth in Motion: The Recursive Anthropology of Cuban Divination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Holbraad, Martin, and Morten Axel Pedersen. 2009. “Planet M: The Intense Abstraction of Marilyn Strathern.” Anthropological Theory 9 (4): 371394.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holbraad, Martin, and Morten Axel Pedersen. 2017. The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ingold, Tim. 2008. “Anthropology Is Not Ethnography.” Proceedings of the British Academy 154: 6992.

  • Ingold, Tim. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London; New York: Routledge.

  • Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Trans. Catherine Porter. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

  • Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30: 225248.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leach, Edmund. 1966. Rethinking Anthropology. London: Athlone Press.

  • Leach, Edmund. 1976. “Social Anthropology: A Natural Science of Society?Proceedings of the British Academy 62: 157180.

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1958. Anthropologie Structurale [Structural anthropology]. Paris: Plon.

  • Mill, John Stuart. 1856. A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive, Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence, and the Methods of Scientific Investigation. Vol. 2. London: John W. Parker and Son.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nadel, Siegfried F. 1957. The Theory of Social Structure. London: Cohen & West.

  • Partridge, Tristan. 2014. “Diagrams in Anthropology: Lines and Interactions.” Life Off the Grid. https://anthropologyoffthegrid.wordpress.com/ethnograms/diagrams-in-anthropology/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Porter, Theodore M. 1992. “Quantification and the Accounting Ideal in Science.” Social Studies of Science 22 (4): 633651.

  • Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1940. “On Social Structure.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 70 (1): 112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rio, Knut M. 2005. “Discussions around a Sand-Drawing: Creations of Agency and Society in Melanesia.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 11 (3): 401423.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rio, Knut M. 2007. The Power of Perspective: Social Ontology and Agency on Ambrym Island, Vanuatu. New York: Berghahn Books.

  • Rumsey, Alan. 2004. “Ethnographic Macro-Tropes and Anthropological Theory.” Anthropological Theory 4 (3): 267298.

  • Schneider, David M. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

  • Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2000. “Diagrams as Centerpiece of a Peircean Epistemology.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 36 (3): 357384.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Strathern, Marilyn. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Strathern, Marilyn. 2014. “Reading Relations Backwards.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 20 (1): 319.

  • Thornton, R. J. 1988. “The Rhetoric of Ethnographic Holism.” Cultural Anthropology 3 (3): 285303.

  • Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. 1993. In the Realm of the Diamond Queen: Marginality in an Out-of-the-Way Place. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2001. “GUT Feelings about Amazonia: Potential Affinity and the Construction of Sociality.” In Beyond the Visible and the Material: The Amerindianization of Society in the Work of Peter Rivière, ed. Laura M. Rival and Neil Whitehead, 1943. New York: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2004. “Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation.” Tipití 2 (1): 322.

  • Wagner, Roy. 1981. The Invention of Culture. Rev. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 683 153 18
Full Text Views 96 16 1
PDF Downloads 158 32 3