Invoking a World of Ideas

Theory and Interpretation in the Justification of Colonialism

in Theoria
David Boucher Cardiff University

Search for other papers by David Boucher in
Current site
Google Scholar
Restricted access


In this article I want to draw upon examples from European settlement in the Americas, Australasia and South Africa in order to argue that modern colonisation and imperialism, despite considerable variation, drew upon a range of justificatory principles which constituted a background theory, or worldview, that was invoked in part or in its entirety in justifying the civilising mission which was viewed by its proponents as both a right and a duty. I begin by showing how the infamous ‘Requirement’ (‘Requerimiento’) of 1513 becomes intelligible as a performative utterance when connected to the constellation of ideas which makes it warrantably assertible, to use John Dewey’s terminology. It is not so much about the land or its use in conceptual terms but instead about the larger value judgements the colonists were applying. It is contended that despite the variation in emphases and conclusions, and the different levels of discourse at which justifications are offered, the efficacy and veracity of colonial and imperialist justifications invoke the authority of the world of ideas in which the assertions alone have intelligibility.

Contributor Notes

David Boucher is Professor of Political Philosophy and International Relations, and Director of the Collingwood and British Idealism Centre at Cardiff University. He is Distinguished Visiting Professor, Johannesburg University. Professor Boucher has published widely in international political theory and history of political thought. His most recent books include The Limits of Ethics in International Relations (2009); British Idealism: A Guide for the Perplexed (2011 with Andrew Vincent); R.G Collingwood: An Autobigraphy and Other Writings with Essays on Collingwood’s Life and Work (2013, ed. with Teresa Smith). He has recently completed a book on the use of Thomas Hobbes in law, politics and international relations.

  • Collapse
  • Expand


A Journal of Social and Political Theory

  • Anghie, A. 2005. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Arnold, T. 1831. ‘The Labourers of England’, Englishman’s Register, 6 (11 June): 1559.

  • Austin, J. L. 1972. How to Do Things With Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Bain, W. 2003. Between Anarchy and Society: Trusteeship and the Obligations of Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Banner, S. 2005a. ‘Why Terra Nullius? Anthropology and Property Law in Early Australia’, Law and History Review 23: 95132.

  • Banner, S. 2005b. How the Indians Lost Their Land: Power and Law on the Frontier. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

  • Bennett, M. M. 1930. The Australian Aboriginal as a Human Being. London: Alston Rivers.

  • Bunce, C. T. 1900. ‘A Brief History of the Transvaal Republic’, in F. A. Mackenzie and C. N. T. Du Plessis (eds), The Real Paul Kruger and the Transvaal. New York: Street and Smith, 151218.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burke, T. 1994. Dewey’s New Logic: A Reply to Russell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Cancellier, A. 1993. ‘Conquistadors and Immigrants: Linguistic Conflicts in the Impact with the New World’, in M. B. Mignone (ed.), Columbus: Meeting of Cultures. New York: Forum Italicum, 7682.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collingwood, R. G. 1993. The Idea of History, revised edition, ed. J. van der Dussen. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Collingwood, R. G. 1998. An Essay on Philosophical Method, revised edition, ed. R. Martin. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Collingwood, R. G. 2005a. An Essay on Philosophical Method, revised edition, ed. J. Connelly and G. D’Oro. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Collingwood, R. G. 2005b. The Philosophy of Enchantment: Studies in Folktale, Cultural Criticism, and Anthropology, ed. D. Boucher, W. James and P. Smallwood. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cortes, H. 1986. Letters From Mexico, revised edition, trans. A. Pagden. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Dewey, J. 1938. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt.

  • Dewey, J. 1941. ‘Propositions, Warranted Assertibility, and Truth’, The Journal of Philosophy 38: 16986.

  • Du Toit, A. and H. Giliomee. 1983. Afrikaner Political Thought: Analysis and Documents, Volume One 1780–1850. Cape Town: David Philip.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Faudree, P. 2013. ‘How to Say Things with Wars: Performativity and Discursive Rupture in the Requerimiento of the Spanish Conquest’, Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 22: 182200.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frost, M. 2008. Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Gadamer, H.-G. 1975. Truth and Method. London: Sheed and Ward.

  • Gadamer, H.-G. 1976. Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Green, L. C. and O. P. Dickason. 1993. The Law of Nations and the New World. Edmonton, Alberta: University of Alberta Press.

  • Hanke, L. 1935. The First Social Experiments in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Hanke, L. 1949. The Spanish Struggle for Justice in the Conquest of America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • Hanke, L. 1959. Aristotle and the American Indians. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.

  • Hanke, L. 1974. All Mankind Is One. DeKalb: University of Illinois Press.

  • Hickford, M. 2006. ‘“Decidedly the Most Interesting Savages on the Globe”: An Approach to the Intellectual History of Māori Property Rights, 837–53’, History of Political Thought 27: 12267.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kruger, P. 1902. The Memoirs of Paul Kruger, ed. A. Schowalter. Toronto: Morang.

  • Kuhn, T. S. 1979. The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Kuhn, T. S. 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 13th anniversary edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Las Casas, B. de. 1992. In Defense of the Indians. DeKalb: University of Northern Illinois Press.

  • Lindquist, S. 2007. Terra Nullius: A Journey through No One’s Land, trans. S. Death. London: Granta Books.

  • Livingstone, D. [1857] 1859. Livingstone’s Travels and Researches in South Africa. Philadelphia: J. W. Bradley.

  • Locke, J. 1988. Two Treatises of Government, ed. P. Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lugard, F. [1922] 1965. The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa, 5th edition. London: Frank Cass.

  • Mills, C. W. 1997. The Racial Contract. New York: Cornell University Press.

  • Mills, C. W. 2003. From Class to Race: Essays in White Marxism and Black Radicalism. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

  • Muldoon, J. 1979. Popes, Lawyers, and Infidels: The Church and the Non-Christian World, 1250–1550. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Muldoon, J. 1980. ‘John Wyclif and the Rights of the Infidels: The Requeriminto Re-Examined’, The Americas 36: 30116.

  • Oakeshott, M. 1933. Experience and Its Modes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Oakeshott, M. 1983. On History and Other Essays. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Pagden, A. 1987. ‘Dispossessing the Barbarian: The Language of Spanish Thomism and the Debate over the Property Rights of American Indians’, in A. Pagden (ed.), The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 7998.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pateman, C. and C. W. Mills. 2007. Contract and Domination. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Peters, F. E. 2004. The Children of Abraham: Judaism, Christianity, Islam, new edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Pocock, J. G. A. 2005. Barbarism and Religion: Volume 4: Barbarians, Savages and Empires. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Requerimiento’. 1513. (accessed 1 March 2016) [The link wrongly states it was written in 1510].

  • Sepúlveda, J. G. de. 1973. ‘Apology for the Book on the Just Causes of War: Dedicated to the Most Learned and Distinguished President, Antonio Ramirez, Bishop of Segovia’, trans. L. D. Epstein, unpublished, Bowden College, U.S.A.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stephen, L. 1892. ‘Ethics and the Struggle for Existence’, Contemporary Review 64.

  • Textor, J. W. [1680] 1916. Synopsis of the Law of Nations, trans. J. Pawley Bate, introduction by L. von Bar. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Foundation.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Toulmin, S. 1972. Human Understanding, Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Vattel, E. D. 1834. The Law of Nations or the Principles of the Law of Nature: Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and of Sovereigns, translation of the 1758 edition by J. Chitty. London: Sweet, Stevens, Maxwell and Milliken.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vitoria, F. de. 1991. Political Writings, ed. A. Pagden and J. Lawrence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Wolff, C. 1934. The Law of Nations Treated According to a Scientific Method, translation of the 1764 edition by J. H. Drake. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 743 290 63
Full Text Views 51 6 0
PDF Downloads 38 8 1