Moral Conflict

The Private, the Public and the Political

in Theoria
View More View Less
  • 1 University of Exeter M.Filis@exeter.ac.uk
Restricted access

Abstract

This article investigates the connection between the phenomenon of moral conflict and the concepts of the private, the public and the political. In the first part of the article, as a way of locating my pluralistic position within the tradition of authors such as Isaiah Berlin and Steven Lukes, I develop a brief overview of modern meta-ethics and argue that monistic and relativistic explanations of morality are the cause of many of the antinomies that trouble human conduct. In the second part of the article, I make the central contention that moral pluralism is particularly useful in clarifying the concepts of the private, the public and the political as distinct domains of activity. I argue that we should treat moral conflict differently in each of these three domains and conclude that the moral significance and peculiarity of politics has been undeservedly underestimated in contemporary times.

Contributor Notes

Dr Marios Filis is a lecturer of Political Theory at the University of Exeter. His doctoral thesis explored the inner connection between politics and morality from both a historical and an analytical perspective, and his current research and publication interests lie in the theory of moral pluralism and its political implications. He has taught a number of various courses on the History of Political Thought and Political Ethics.

Theoria

A Journal of Social and Political Theory

  • Arendt, H. 1998. The Human Condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Berlin, I. 2002. Liberty, ed. H. Hardy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Blackburn, S. 2009. The Big Questions: Philosophy. London: Quercus Publishing.

  • Bosanquet, B. 1899. Philosophical Theory of the State. London: Bibliolife (Macmillan and Co.).

  • Frazer, E. 2010. ‘Hannah Arendt: The risks of the Public Realm’, in N. O’Sullivan (ed.), The Concept of the Public Realm. Oxon: Routledge, 83103.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gowans, C. W. 1987. ‘The Debate on Moral Dilemmas’, in C. W. Gowans (ed.), Moral Dilemmas. New York: Oxford University Press, 333.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hampshire, S. (ed.). 1978. Public and Private Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hampshire, S. 1978. ‘Public and Private Morality’, in S. Hampshire (ed.), Public and Private Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2354.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heller, A. 1991. ‘The Concept of the Political Revisited’, in D. Held (ed.), Political Theory Today. Oxford: Polity Press, 33043.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hursthouse, R. 2001. On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Johnson, P. 1988. Politics, Innocence, and the Limits of Goodness. London: Routledge.

  • Kekes, J. 1993. The Morality of Pluralism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Kekes, J. 2000. Pluralism in Philosophy: Changing the Subject. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  • Larmore, C. 1987. Patterns of Moral Complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Larmore, C. 1996. The Morals of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Larmore, C. 2008. The Autonomy of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lassman, P. 2011. Pluralism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Lukes, S. 1991. Moral Conflict and Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Lukes, S. 2008. Moral Relativism. London: Profile Books.

  • Mahajan, G. 2010. ‘Reconsidering the Private-public Distinction’, in N. O’Sullivan (ed.), The Concept of the Public Realm. Oxon: Routledge, 1626.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McFall, L. 1987. ‘Integrity’, Ethics 98(1): 520.

  • Mill, J. S. 1987. ‘Utilitarianism and Moral Conflicts’, in C. W. Gowans (ed.), Moral Dilemmas. New York: Oxford University Press, 10114.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moser, P. K. and T. L. Carson. 2001. ‘Introduction’, in P. K. Moser and T. L. Carson (eds), Moral Relativism: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1-21.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nagel, T. 1978. ‘Ruthlessness in Public Life’, in S. Hampshire (ed.), Private and Public Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 7592.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nagel, T. 1987. ‘The Fragmentation of Value’, in C. W. Gowans (ed.), Moral Dilemmas. New York: Oxford University Press, 17487.

  • Nagel, T. 1991. Equality and Partiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • O’Sullivan, N. (ed.). 2010. The Concept of the Public Realm. Oxon: Routledge.

  • Rachels, J. 2003. The Elements of Moral Philosophy. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Stocker, M. 1990. Plural and Conflicting Values. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Thompson, D. F. 2005. Restoring Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Walzer, M. 1973. ‘Political Action: The Problem of Dirty Hands’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 2(2): 16080.

  • Williams, B. 2008. In the Beginning Was the Deed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Wong, D. 1993. Relativism, in P. Singer (ed.), Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 44250.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 58 58 6
Full Text Views 3 3 1
PDF Downloads 3 3 2