Defending the Traditional Interpretations of Kant’s Formula of a Law of Nature

in Theoria
Author: Samuel Kahn1
View More View Less
  • 1 Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis
Restricted access

In this article I defend the traditional interpretations of Kant’s Formula of a Law of Nature from recent attacks levelled by Faviola Rivera-Castro, James Furner, Ido Geiger, Pauline Kleingeld and Sven Nyholm. After a short introduction, the article is divided into four main sections. In the first, I set out the basics of the three traditional interpretations, the Logical Contradiction Interpretation, the Practical Contradiction Interpretation and the Teleological Contradiction Interpretation. In the second, I examine the work of Geiger, Kleingeld and Nyholm: these three commentators reject the traditional interpretations entirely, but I argue that this rejection is ill-founded. In the third and fourth, I take a detailed look at Furner’s work, work in which he seeks to revise (rather than reject) the traditional interpretations. I argue that, despite his more modest aims, Furner’s revision is also ill-founded.


A Journal of Social and Political Theory


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 110 72 6
Full Text Views 24 4 0
PDF Downloads 38 0 0