Republican Freedom in the Labour Market

Exploitation Without Interpersonal Domination

in Theoria
View More View Less
  • 1 Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies (Pisa)
Restricted access

In this article, I query whether participation in the labour market can hinder neo-republican freedom as non-domination. I briefly present the view of Philip Pettit on the topic, based on the distinction between offering a reward and threatening a punishment. I compare it to the analysis of labour republicans, recently reconstructed by Alex Gourevitch, according to whom, the exclusion of a group of individuals from the control of productive assets represents a form of structural domination. Then, I explain why I take a position that is different from both. I hold that capitalist structural domination leads only to exploitation, not interpersonal domination. In doing this, I consider two objections that might be raised against my argument. The first one is based on incomplete contracts and on a possible ideal benchmark for job offers. The second one challenges the supposed arbitrariness of unequal property relations within the capitalist social system.


A Journal of Social and Political Theory


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 114 114 46
Full Text Views 11 11 0
PDF Downloads 22 22 0