Dirty Hands and Suffering

in Theoria
View More View Less
  • 1 Canterbury Christ Church University
Restricted access

Contra the prevalent way of thinking about the dirty-hands problem, this article suggests that dirty hands need not necessarily entail suffering and that a politician who does not suffer for his dirty-handed acts should not be cast as a bad politician. In so doing, the article: (i) argues that the connection between DH and suffering is unsatisfactorily totalising and rests on a contentious conception of conflict as a dysfunction and (ii) develops an alternative account of the good dirty-handed politician, which is associated with what proponents of the prevalent view of the problem find impossible: calm acceptance of – even indulgence in – one’s dirt. This recognition has important implications for our contemporary culture of contrition and for the way we evaluate the characters of our politicians.


A Journal of Social and Political Theory


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 175 99 2
Full Text Views 22 0 0
PDF Downloads 51 0 0