Deliberative Agonism and Agonistic Deliberation in Hannah Arendt

in Theoria
Author:
Giuseppe Ballacci Research Fellow, University of Minho, Portugal gballacci@ilch.uminho.pt

Search for other papers by Giuseppe Ballacci in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

In the literature there are two well-established but opposite readings of Arendt: as an agonistic theorist and as a deliberative one. In between these two positions a smaller number of scholars have argued that in Arendt these two dimensions can to a large extent be reconciled. This paper follows this third path but tries to bring it one step further. In particular, it defends the idea that those scholars who have proposed this third reading of Arendt have fallen short of revealing the degree to which deliberation and agonism are, for her, interwoven. Through an original reading of Arendt's views on judgment, persuasion, distinction and Eichmann's banality, the paper clarifies why, for her, agonism and deliberation are not only compatible but actually mutually dependent. In other words, it clarifies why she believes that there can be no deliberation without agonism and no agonism without deliberation.

Contributor Notes

Giuseppe Ballacci is a research fellow at the Centre for Ethics, Politics and Society at the University of Minho. He holds a PhD in political theory from the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid and has been a visiting scholar at the Humboldt University of Berlin and University of Chicago, associate researcher of the Centre de Théorie Politique, at the Université Libre de Bruxelles and adjunct professor at the IE University (Madrid) and Vesalius College (Brussels). His areas of interest are contemporary political theory, history of political thought, democratic theory, political representation and rhetoric. Among his recent publications: Political Theory between Philosophy and Rhetoric: Politics as Transcendence and Contingency (Palgrave MacMillan 2018); ‘Representing Judgment – Judging Representation: Rhetoric, Judgment and Ethos in Democratic Representation’, Contemporary Political Theory (2018); ‘Richard Rorty's Unfulfilled Humanism and the Public/Private Divide’, Review of Politics (2017). E-mail: gballacci@ilch.uminho.pt

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Theoria

A Journal of Social and Political Theory

  • Arendt, H. 1953. ‘The Origins of Totalitarianism: A Reply’, Review of Politics 15 (1): 7684.

  • Arendt, H. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

  • Arendt, H. 1968. Between Past and Future. New York: Viking Press.

  • Arendt, H. 1970. Men in Dark Times. New York: Harcourt Brace.

  • Arendt, H. 1971. On Revolution. New York: Viking Press.

  • Arendt, H. 1972. Crises of the Republic. New York: Harcourt Brace.

  • Arendt, H. 1978. The Life of the Mind. New York: Harcourt Brace.

  • Arendt, H. 1979. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace.

  • Arendt, H. 1982. Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy, ed. R. Beiner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Arendt, H. 1990. ‘Philosophy and Politics’, Social Research 57 (1): 73103.

  • Arendt, H. 1994. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Penguin Books.

  • Arendt, H. 2003a. ‘Thinking and Moral Considerations’, in J. Kohn (ed.), Responsibility and Judgment. New York: Schocken Books, 159193.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arendt, H. 2003b. Denktagebuch: 1950–1973, U. Ludz and I. Nordmann (ed.). Munich: Piper Verlag.

  • Arendt, H. 2005. ‘Introduction into Politics’, in J. Kohn (ed.), The Promise of Politics. New York: Schocken Books, 93200.

  • Beiner, R. 1997. ‘Rereading Hannah Arendt's Kant Lectures’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (1): 2132.

  • Benhabib, S. 1988. ‘Judgment and the Moral Foundations of Politics in Arendt's Thought’, Political Theory 16 (1): 2951.

  • Benhabib, S. 1992. Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. London: Routledge.

  • Bernstein, R. 1986. Philosophical Profiles: Essays in a Pragmatic Mode. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • Canovan, M. 1978. ‘The Contradiction of Arendt's Political Thought’, Political Theory 6 (1): 526.

  • Erman, E. 2009. ‘What Is Wrong with Agonistic Pluralism?: Reflections on Conflict in Democratic Theory’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (9): 10391062.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ferrara, A. 2008. The Force of the Example: Explorations in the Paradigm of Judgment. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Fossen, T. 2007. ‘Agonistic Critiques of Liberalism: Perfection and Emancipation’, Contemporary Political Theory 7 (4): 376394.

  • Fuss, P. 1979. ‘Hannah Arendt's Conception of Political Community’, in M. A. Hill (ed.), Hannah Arendt: The Recovery of the Public World. New York: St. Martin's Press, 157176.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Garsten, B. 2006. Saving Persuasion: A Defense of Rhetoric and Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Garsten, B. 2007. ‘The Elusiveness of Arendtian Judgment’, Social Research 74 (4): 10711108.

  • Gündogdu, A. 2015. Rightlessness in an Age of Rights: Hannah Arendt and the Contemporary Struggles of Migrants. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Habermas, J. 1994. ‘Hannah Arendt's Communications Concept of Power’, in L. P. Hinchman and S. K. Hinchman (eds), Hannah Arendt: Critical Essays. Albany: State University of New York Press, 211230.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harris, A. 1996. ‘Arendt, Kant, and the Politics of Common Sense’, Polity 29 (2): 165191.

  • Hinchman L. P. and Hinchman S. K. 1991. ‘Existentialism Politicized: Arendt's Debt to Jaspers’, Review of Politics 53 (3): 435468.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Honig, B. 1993a. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Honig, B. 1993b. ‘The Politics of Agonism: A Critical Response to “Beyond Good and Evil: Arendt, Nietzsche, and the Aestheticization of Political Action” by Dana R. Villa’, Political Theory 21 (3): 528533.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kalyvas, A. 2009. ‘The Democratic Narcissus: The Agonism of the Ancients Compared to that of the PostModerns’, in A. Schaap (ed.), Law and Agonistic Politics. Farnham: Ashgate Pub. Company, 1541.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kant, I. 2007. The Critique of Judgement, trans. J. C. Meredith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Karagiannis, N. and Wagner, P. 2005. ‘Towards a Theory of Synagonism’, Journal of Political Philosophy 13 (3): 235262.

  • Kateb, G. 1984. Hannah Arendt: Politics, Conscience, Evil. Oxford: Robertson.

  • Kirsch, A. 2009. ‘Beware of Pity: Hannah Arendt and the Power of the Impersonal’, The New Yorker.

  • Knops, A. 2007. ‘Debate: Agonism as Deliberation – On Mouffe's Theory of Democracy’, Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (1): 115126.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lederman, S. 2014. ‘Agonism and Deliberation in Arendt’, Constellations 21 (3): 327337.

  • Marshall, D. 2010. ‘The Origin and Character of Hannah Arendt's Theory of Judgment’, Political Theory 38 (3): 367393.

  • Moruzzi, N. C. 2000. Speaking Through the Mask: Hannah Arendt and the Politics of Social Identity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Norberg, J. 2010. ‘The Political Theory of the Cliché: Hannah Arendt Reading of Adolf Eichmann’, Cultural Critique 76: 7497.

  • Parekh, B. 1981. Hannah Arendt and the Search for a New Political Philosophy. London: MacMillan.

  • Passerin d'Entrèves, M. 1994. The Political Philosophy of Hannah Arendt. London: Routledge.

  • Schaap, A. 2007. ‘Political Theory and the Agony of Politics’, Political Studies Review 5 (1): 5674.

  • Schwartz, J. 2016. Arendt's Judgment: Freedom, Responsibility, Citizenship. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • Taminiaux, J. 1997. The Thracian Maid and the Professional Thinker: Arendt and Heidegger. Albany: State University of New York Press.

  • Thomassen, L. 2005. ‘Antagonism, Hegemony and Ideology after Heterogeneity’, Journal of Political Ideologies 10 (3): 289309.

  • Tsao, R. 2002. ‘Arendt against Athens: Rereading the Human Condition’, Political Theory 30 (1): 97123.

  • Villa, D. 1992. ‘Beyond Good and Evil: Arendt, Nietzsche, and the Aestheticization of Political Action’, Political Theory 20 (2): 274308.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Villa, D. 1996. Arendt and Heidegger: The Fate of the Political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Villa, D. 1999. Politics, Philosophy, Terror: Essays on the Thought of Hannah Arendt. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Voegelin, E. 1953. ‘Review of Hannah Arendt's “The Origins of Totalitarianism”’, Review of Politics 15 (1): 6876.

  • Wellmer, A. 1993. ‘Hannah Arendt on Judgment: The Unwritten Doctrine of Reason’, in Endspiele: Die unversöhnliche Moderne. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zerilli, L. 2016. A Democratic Theory of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1011 492 48
Full Text Views 75 3 0
PDF Downloads 99 6 0