A Negative Theory of Justice

Towards a Critical Theory of Power Relations

in Theoria
Author:
Leonard Mazzone University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy leonard.mazzone@unimib.it

Search for other papers by Leonard Mazzone in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This article outlines the chief challenges concerning the philosophical theories of emancipation and clarifies the solutions provided by a so-called negative theory of justice. Besides highlighting the classic questions that every philosophical theory of emancipation is expected to answer, the article aims to highlight the link between this theoretical framework and an immanent critique of conditions of domination. Moreover, it sheds light on the main differences between this theoretical perspective and Honneth's theory of recognition, Fraser's three-dimensional conception of justice, and the critique of power relations recently advanced by Rainer Forst. The comparative analysis of these theoretical approaches will make it possible to highlight and appreciate the main merits of a so-called negative theory of justice that combines a multidimensional diagnosis of existing asymmetries of power with an immanent critique of their justifications.

Contributor Notes

Leonard Mazzone is Post-Doctorate Research Fellow in Social and Political Philosophy at the Department of Sociology and Social Research of the University of Milano-Bicocca. His current research project concerns the ‘politics of fear’ and the socio-cultural and juridical processes underlying the devices of urban security. In the last few years his research interests have been focused on a genealogy of the concept of hypocrisis and on the political uses of the notion of ‘Democratic Hypocrisis’. This research project represents a further development of his doctoral thesis on the works and the life of Elias Canetti. His research interests also concern the history and the most recent developments of the critical theory of society and the socio-political implications of a ‘negative theory of justice’. E-mail: leonard.mazzone@unimib.it

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Theoria

A Journal of Social and Political Theory

  • Boltanski, L. 2008. Rendre la réalité inacceptable. À propos de ‘La production de l'idéologie dominante. Paris: Demopolis.

  • Boltanski, L. and É. Chiapello. 1999. Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.

  • Canetti, E. 1960. Masse und Macht. München: Claassen.

  • Celikates, R. 2018. Beyond the Critical Theorists’ Nightmare: Epistemic Injustice, Looping Effects, and Ideology Critique. Working paper. Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Philosophie Department.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Déjours, C. 1998. Souffrance en France. Paris: Seuil.

  • Forst, R. 1999. ‘The Basic Right to Justification: Toward a Constructivist Conception of Human Rights’, Constellations, 6 (1): 3560. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00119

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Forst, R. 2007. ‘First Things First’, European Journal of Political Theory 1: 291304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885107077318.

  • Forst, R. 2011a. ‘The Ground of Critique: On the Concept of Human Dignity in Social Orders of Justification’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (9): 965976. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453711416082.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Forst, R. 2011b. ‘The Power of Critique’, Political Theory 39 (1): 118123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591710386550.

  • Forst, R. 2012. The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Forst, R. 2014. Justification and Critique. Towards a Critical Theory of Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Forst, R. 2015. ‘Noumenal Power’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (2): 111127. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12046.

  • Fraser, N. 2003. ‘Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation’, in Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth (eds), Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso, 7109.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fraser, N. 2008. Scales of Justice. Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Fraser, N. 2013. Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. London: Verso.

  • Fraser, N. 2015. ‘Legitimation Crisis? On the Political Contradictions of Financialized Capitalism’, Critical Historical Studies 2 (2): 157189. https://doi.org/10.1086/683054.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice. Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hegel, G. W. 2008. Outlines of the Philosophy of Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Honneth, A. 2007. ‘Recognition as Ideology’, in B. Van den Brink and D. Owen, (eds), Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 323347.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Honneth, A. 2009. Pathologies of Reason. On the Legacy of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Jaeggi, R. 2009. ‘Rethinking Ideology’, in De B. Boudewijn and Z. Christopher (eds), New Waves in Political Philosophy. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 6386.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kant, I. (1784) 2009. An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’ New York: Penguin.

  • La Boétie, É. 2015. The Politics of Obedience. Discourse on Voluntary Servitude. Ludwig von Mises Institute.

  • Latour, B. 1984. ‘The Powers of Association’, The Sociological Review 32: 264280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00115.x.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lovett, F. 2009. ‘Domination and Distributive Justice’, The Journal of Politics 71 (3): 817830. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090732.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lovett, F. 2010. A General Theory of Domination and Justice. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.

  • Margalit, A. 1996. The Decent Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Markle, G. 2004. ‘From Struggles for Recognition to a Plural Concept of Justice’, Acta Sociologica 47 (4): 383391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699304048674.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martuccelli, D. (2004). ‘Figures de la domination’, Revue Francaise de sciologie 45 (3): 469497. DOI: 10.2307/3323085.

  • Marx, K. (1848) 2014. The Communist Manifesto. New York: International Publishers Co.

  • Mazzone, L. (2020). ‘A Theatrical Conception of Social Power’, European Journal of Political Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885120922778.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McNay, L. 2020. ‘The Limits of Justification: Critique, Disclosure and Reflexivity’, European Journal of Political Theory 19 (1): 2646. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885116670294.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Plato. 2007. The Republic. New York: Penguin.

  • Pulcini, E. 2016. ‘Filosofia sociale: critica del presente e prospettive per il futuro’, Politica & Società 3: 299324. DOI: 10.4476/85511.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Renault, E. 2008. Souffrances sociales. Philosophie, psychologie et politique. Paris: La Découverte.

  • Rosa, H. 2010. Alienation and Acceleration: Towards a Critical Theory of Late-Modern Temporality. Aarhus University Press.

  • Sloterdijk, P. 1988. Critique of Cynical Reason. London: Verso.

  • Scott, J. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Shklar, J. 1990. The Faces of Injustice. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Susen S. (2018). ‘The Seductive Force of ‘Noumenal Power’: A New Path (or Impasse) for Critical Theory?’, Journal of Political Power 11 (1): 445. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2017.1362734

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.

  • Walzer, M. 1985. Interpretation and Social Criticism. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Harvard University.

  • Young, I. M. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Yuval-Davis 2011. ‘Power, Intersectionality and the Politics of Belonging’. FREIA Working Paper Series, 75. Available at: www.researchgate.net/profile/Nira_Yuval-Davis/publication/308784296_Power_Intersectionality_and_the_Politics_of_Belonging/links/54d1fd070cf25ba0f04228ea/Power-Intersectionality-and-the-Politics-of-Belonging.pdf

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1327 355 78
Full Text Views 89 2 0
PDF Downloads 127 2 0