Learning from a Contested Project in the Netherlands

The Clash over the Amelisweerd Forest, 1957–1982

in Transfers
Author:
Odette van de Riet
Search for other papers by Odette van de Riet in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Bert Toussaint
Search for other papers by Bert Toussaint in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

The Amelisweerd case, a highly debated highway network expansion project from the late 1970s, has been widely portrayed as a symbolic mismatch between government and entrenched stakeholder opposition. The aim of this article is to learn from the case by unraveling the policy process using a multiactor policy analysis model. The result is that the policy process scores poorly on all the three applied criteria, and this has had a discernible negative effect on the level of stakeholder support for the policy proposals. Since then, major changes have taken place in the planning processes of infrastructural projects in the Netherlands. However, the potential for learning from Amelisweerd is much wider, as since the 1960s public projects are increasingly subject to public scrutiny and comment. Careful analysis from iconic cases like Amelisweerd can help current infrastructural policymakers and planning project managers as they develop fresh policies and projects.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Transfers

Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies