Mobilities and the Multinatural

A Test Case in India

in Transfers
View More View Less
  • 1 University of Wollongong
Restricted access


This article examines whether the mobilities paradigm could be more sensitive to recent debates about the more-than-human (animals, plants, and insects) and indeed the inhuman (geological, planetary, and biophysical). Many possible examples spring to mind: the forced movement of people due to “natural” catastrophes, the annual migrations of birds across vast distances, the accidental and intentional spread of invasive weeds. “Multinatural mobilities” are at present both inside and outside of the paradigm’s core themes. Can mobilities go beyond transportation, migration, urban development, the hypermobility of the few, and the comparative immobility of the world’s majority of people to encompass everything that moves? Or does this risk diluting the novelty of the paradigm? By presenting a test case of a potential research theme on wild animals in India’s urban spaces, this article argues that by thinking multinaturally progress can be reached in applying the rich mobilities framework to problems in mobility systems.

Contributor Notes

Thomas Birtchnell is a senior lecturer at the Australian Centre for Cultural and Environmental Research at the University of Wollongong. His research interests lie at the interface between sustainable development and grassroots innovation. His most recent work has been on technological innovations such as 3D printing and the mobilities of talent and knowledge to and from the Global South—in particular, India. See


Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies