Hannah Arendt and Alexander and Margarete Mitscherlich produced influential accounts of the postwar West-German population's silence or inarticuleteness. The Mitscherlichs claimed that this silence was symptomatic of a blocked process of mourning; Arendt saw it as a legacy of brutal totalitarian rule. However, both viewed the rapid economic recovery as evidence of the German inability to engage in discursively mediated therapeutic and political processes. Frantic busyness was a form of silence. This paper presents a critical reassessment of these approaches. By drawing on Albert Hirschman's theory of exit and voice, it argues that economic activity possesses a communicative dimension. The alleged retreat from politics is not a symptom of muteness but rather indicates people's preference for an alternative mode of communication. Arendt and the Mitscherlich may be right in assuming a correlation between the postwar economic recovery and ostensible political apathy, but lack the conceptual means to clarify the relationship.
Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for :
- "ALEXANDER MITSCHERLICH" x
- Refine by Access: All content x
- Refine by Content Type: All x
Introduction
Innocence and the Politics of Memory
Jonathan Bach and Benjamin Nienass
take on the problematic some decades later, see Alexander Mitscherlich and Margarete Mitscherlich, The Inability to Mourn: Principles of Collective Behavior (New York, 1975). 11 Just in the last few years, see, for example, Angelika Bammer, Born
Samuel Salzborn
Allgemeine Zeitung online , 14 September 2017. 37 Alexander Mitscherlich and Margarete Mitscherlich, Die Unfähigkeit zu trauern: Grundlagen kollektiven Verhaltens (Munich, 1980), 53–54. 38 Quoted in Hans-W. Saure and Anton Maegerle, “Skandal um