Starting from a number of general tenets about radical political parties, this article examines the Front National (FN) in relation to its core policy issue of immigration. To what extent has FN immigration policy been defined from the outset by its radicalism? Has that radicalism been constant or variable over time? And how far can a reciprocal influence be detected between the FN and the center Right in immigration policy formulation? Focusing on election campaigns, manifestos, and key moments in the FN's evolution, the article assesses how the party has tailored its radicalism to contextual factors and tactical considerations. It reveals an FN less bound to a fixed policy and more ready to seek accommodation (with circumstance, public opinion, or the center Right) than is generally acknowledged. Conversely, it also assesses how the FN's mobilization of strong support on the immigration issue has had radicalizing effects on the center Right. The article concludes by considering whether the change of leadership in January 2011 might confine the FN to the radical Right or see it adopt a more center-oriented course.
Tactical Variation in Core Policy Formation by the Front National
Badiouian Diagnosis, Lacanian Cure, Sartrean Responsibility
‘multiculturalism’ (against the imposition of a unified model of behaviour and intellectual approach).’ 91 Many a contemporary American reader, frustrated by openly xenophobic and reactionary immigration policies of the Trump administration, might find this line of
Acting Up on Science and Immigration in France
Michael J. Bosia
From a postcolonial left that challenges the French state over immigration policy and neoliberal globalization, Act Up has advocated for the social and political rights and needs of women, inmates, drug users, and immigrants with HIV/AIDS. This essay examines as well Act Up's engagement with science and globalization in response to new experimental medical trials in the Global South. Act Up's emphasis on local empowerment against global economic and social actors has earned criticism from American and South African AIDS activists, but at the same time these campaigns stress the universalist impulse imbedded in the Act Up brand of French Republican politics.
Bureaucratic Practices and the Lived Experience in the French Naturalization Process
migration flows made the issue of naturalization frame that of immigration policy as well. 13 The criteria that had previously determined whether citizenship was granted or not have indeed become those determining the right of residence. Thus, as a
Narratives of Migration at the Galerie des dons
Abigail E. Celis
are naturalized. Thus, when the logic of hospitality is mapped onto immigration policy and practice, the outcome is subtly pernicious. As Mireille Rosello has demonstrated, France's framing of postcolonial immigration through a hospitality narrative