Hemment, her US-based feminist anthropologist colleague, mentee, and friend. Since we first met in 1995 when Hemment was a doctoral student, we have undertaken several collaborative research projects; our relationship has been one of mutual enlightenment
Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 10 of 34 items for :
- "collaborative research" x
- Refine by Access: My content x
- Refine by Content Type: Articles x
“The 1990s Wasn't Just a Time of Bandits; We Feminists Were Also Making Mischief!”
Celebrating Twenty Years of Feminist Enlightenment Projects in Tver’
Julie Hemment and Valentina Uspenskaya
Toxic Research
Political Ecologies and the Matter of Damage
Noah Theriault and Simi Kang
” is collaborative research that challenges oppression by advancing a community's aspirations, capacities, and resources. This “desire-centered” approach aims not to ignore harm, but instead “to reformulate the ways research is framed and conducted” so
Institutional Readiness for Community–University Alliances
Perspectives on Repatriation
Rebecca L. Bourgeois and Andie D. Palmer
Collaborative research between institutions and Indigenous communities in Canada has aimed to address injustices born out of oppressive colonial power imbalances. Although it is impossible to truly decolonise something that is the direct result of
Introduction
Elusive Matsutake
Lieba Faier
In this special issue, we draw on our collaborative research as the Matsutake Worlds Research Group to explore the world-making dynamics of multispecies encounters. We center our exploration on matsutake, a gourmet mushroom eaten primarily in Japan. Drawing on cases from around the world, we suggest that the cosmopolitan worlds of matsutake cannot be accounted for by any single agent or individual set of cultural or political economic processes. Rather, we propose that contingent multispecies attunements and coordinations knit together the various world-making processes that allow matsutake to flourish. We use the notion of ‘elusiveness’ to capture these shifting dynamics of attraction, coordination, and elusion.
Introduction
Mobility in doctoral education – and beyond
Corina Balaban and Susan Wright
This special issue emerged as a result of Universities in the Knowledge Economy (UNIKE), a four-year collaborative research project and training programme for early-stage researchers that investigated the dynamic relationships between universities and knowledge economies in Europe and in the Asia-Pacific Rim. The project was funded by the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Commission (EC) and included researchers based at six different universities in five European countries. Mobility was not only a widespread research interest within the UNIKE academic community but also a reality of the project, which was in itself a practical example of mobility in doctoral education, as envisaged by the European Commission. Many questions emerged as to how mobility became so central to the European Union’s policies for higher education, but also as to how the portrayal of mobility on a policy level compared to the actual lived experiences of mobile students and researchers. ‘Mobility’ can refer to many different things: geographical mobility, social mobility, cross-sectoral mobility or intellectual mobility (interdisciplinarity). The academic literature mostly treats them separately, with clusters of studies around each concept. In contrast, this special issue sets out to investigate these different types of mobility collectively, with authors covering several parts or the whole spectrum of mobilities. We believe it is valuable to discuss these four different aspects of mobility together for two reasons. First, they are often mentioned together in higher education policy as ‘desirable’ characteristics of a given education programme. Second, the ideal profile of the new, flexible knowledge worker supposedly combines all these aspects of mobility in one persona. The policy literature produced by influential stakeholders in higher education such as the European Commission and the OECD focuses on how to encourage, foster and support different kinds of mobility, working on the assumption that mobility is inherently good and will benefit countries, higher education systems and individuals. Much of the academic literature has adopted a similar approach, focusing on ways to enable mobility rather than challenge it.
Engaged Anthropology and Scholar Activism
Double Contentions
Elisabet Dueholm Rasch, Floor van der Hout, and Michiel Köhne
link to or alignment with a social movement ( Hale 2006 ; Piven 2010 ). Such an approach does not necessarily involve using participatory and collaborative research methods. The second approach is participatory research or the use of methods that
‘My Waka Journey’
Introducing a New Co-Editor
Patrick Laviolette
Cultures and the Journal of Ethnology and Folkloristics. My formal ethnographic fieldwork has included both individual and collaborative research. While employed by the Bartlett School of Graduate Studies at UCL, I collected new empirical material on
Traversing Fields
Affective Continuities across Muslim and Christian Settings in Berlin
Omar Kasmani and Dominik Mattes
(New) Pentecostal Churches in Berlin” (2015–2019). It is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) under the framework of the Collaborative Research Center “Affective Societies” at Freie Universität Berlin. Omar Kasmani and Dominik Mattes work
Learning in Collaborative Moments
Practising Relating Differently with Dementia in Dialogue Meetings
Silke Hoppe, Laura Vermeulen, Annelieke Driessen, Els Roding, Marije de Groot, and Kristine Krause
refusing to draw boundaries between researcher and researched, viewing collaborative research as a form of political action ( Woelders et al. 2015 ). Similarly, within critical pedagogy, the distinction between teacher and student is dissolved, with
Conal McCarthy
, written as part of a collaborative research project about participatory memory practices, which considers Nuala Morse's new book The Museum as a Space of Social Care . In this essay, titled “Care-ful participation in museums,” Inge Zwart, Susanne Boersma