Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for

  • Author: Paul Innes x
  • All content x
Clear All Modify Search
Restricted access

Paul Innes

Bits of Shakespeare can be deleted or at least ‘dispensed with’. This is the possibility mooted by the editor of the Second Arden edition of Cymbeline (J.M. Nosworthy) and it appears in the notes to the wager scene, I.v. The element to be dispensed with is the difficult staging of the minor characters present: Philario, a Frenchman, a Spaniard and a Dutchman.

Restricted access

Paul Innes

In Much Ado About Nothing, characters repeatedly stage moments designed to confuse other figures, a good example being the machinations aimed at Beatrice and Benedick. However, the play contains many more instances in which misrepresentation plays with truth. The supposed offstage seduction of Hero signals the audience that what this unseen (to them) event means will be crucial, making them focus upon the meanings given to the event by the characters. Critics have often noted that the young noblemen get it wrong, and that the play then ironically counterpoints this by making the useless constabulary get it right by apprehending the culprit; they also usually marginalise the older characters, especially the Friar, who is relegated to a plot-function. However, given the play's insistence on perception and misunderstanding, this article revisits their importance in performance as a group that avoids the mistakes made by the younger generation.

Free access

Glennis Byron, Daniel Cordle, Loraine Fletcher, Paul Innes, Victoria Margree, Vassiliki Markidou, and Robin Sims

Notes on contributors