Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 4 of 4 items for :

  • All content x
Clear All
Restricted access

Ronlyn Duncan

The question posed in this article is how shifts in governance ushered in by the sustainability paradigm are reshaping knowledge governance. Drawing on constructivist theories of knowledge, I examine the tension between the sustainability mandate to open up knowledge making to local knowledge, and conventional science policy practice that would see it excluded. I present a water management case study from New Zealand's South Island region of Canterbury, where communities are involved in establishing catchment nutrient limits to manage land use and water quality. It is concluded that although local knowledge was embraced within the knowledge-making process, the pursuit of epistemic authority led to its recalibration, aggregation, and standardization. As such, it was stripped of its complexity. This research highlights the role of politics in anchoring the linear knowledge governance model in place and the challenge for supplanting it.

Full access

Centralized or Decentralized

Which Governance Systems are Having a “Good” Pandemic?

Jennifer Gaskell and Gerry Stoker

, innovative responses Further Research Our argument is not the often-heard claim for more decentralization of power in governance systems or a hymn of praise for collaborative governance. It is that those systems that appear to be emerging

Free access

Resist and Revivify

Democratic Theory in a Time of Defiance

Jean-Paul Gagnon and Emily Beausoleil

Citizens in Collaborative Governance . Washington DC : Brookings Institution Press . Stamati , Teta , Thanos Papadopoulos , and Dimosthenis Anagnostopoulos . 2015 . “ Social Media for Openness and Accountability in the Public Sector: Cases in the

Open access

Adaptation Lived as a Story

Why We Should Be Careful about the Stories We Use to Tell Other Stories

Nicole Klenk

University Press and University of Manitoba Press . Emerson , Kirk , and Andrea K. Gerlak . 2014 . “ Adaptation in Collaborative Governance Regimes ”. Environmental Management 54 ( 4 ): 768 – 781 . . 10