Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 50 items for :

  • "David Bordwell" x
  • Refine by Access: All content x
  • Refine by Content Type: All x
Clear All Modify Search
Restricted access

Questions of Authorship

Some Comments on David Bordwell’s Narration in the Fiction Film

Paisley Livingston

In a review of Narration in the Fiction Film published in Film Quarterly in 1986, Sarah Kozloff complained that David Bordwell’s approach to authorship in this book was “rather misanthropic.” More specifically, her complaint was that he

Restricted access

Sam Roggen

for “more confined drama.” It is remarkable that the increase in the use of the very long shot in Mann’s CinemaScope films does not necessarily imply a decrease in closer shots. David Bordwell (2005: 27 ; 2007: 288 ) has demonstrated how CinemaScope

Restricted access

Christopher Blake Evernden, Cynthia A. Freeland, Thomas Schatz, and Frank P. Tomasulo

Pleasurable Fear . New York : Routledge . Kristeva , Julia . 1980 . Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection . New York : Columbia University Press . David Bordwell, Reinventing Hollywood: How 1940s Filmmakers Changed Movie Storytelling

Restricted access

William Brown

David Bordwell (2002) has described contemporary mainstream cinema as a cinema of intensified continuity. When we combine Bordwell's analysis with that of recent cognitive work on attention, especially with work on edit blindness, we discover some intriguing results. For example, the increased rate of cutting in contemporary cinema serves to keep our attention continually aroused, but, at the same time, that which arouses our attention—the increased number of cuts—becomes decreasingly visible. That is, the greater the number of cuts made in the services of continuity editing, the less we are able to spot them. If, while watching contemporary mainstream cinema, the attention of viewers is aroused but viewers are decreasingly capable of spotting the reasons why this is so (i.e., the cuts themselves), then does this also serve to make contemporary mainstream cinema “post-ideological,” because it concerns itself only with “intensified” experiences? Or, as this article argues, does the sheer speed of contemporary mainstream cinema renew the need for the ideological critique of films?

Restricted access

Malcolm Turvey

The articles that follow were originally presented at a symposium celebrating the thirtieth anniversary of the publication of David Bordwell’s Narration in the Fiction Film . 1 The symposium was the closing plenary session at the Society for

Free access

Stephen Prince

David Bordwell’s Narration in the Fiction Film is one of the groundbreaking books in film and narrative theory, and it has been thirty years since its original publication. We begin this issue with a symposium marking that book’s importance

Free access

Ted Nannicelli

thematically organized: we have a pair of reviews on two novel books on Hollywood cinema—David Bordwell's Reinventing Hollywood and Todd Berliner's Hollywood Aesthetic— and another pair of reviews on book-length explorations of contemporary horror films by

Restricted access

Brian Boyd

worthwhile as a tribute to David Bordwell. The second was that we were asked to offer challenges, and not mere panegyric. That was much harder; and if I do lumber into challenge, it’s only because I am meekly obliging. I can still see the shelves in the big

Restricted access

Janet Staiger

and postulates what goes on for that person. He “assumes a mentally active and engaged spectator, one who performs cognitive work” (4). While Berliner does not quote David Bordwell here (although he relies on him heavily throughout his book), Berliner

Restricted access

Putting the Culture into Bioculturalism

A Naturalized Aesthetics and the Challenge of Modernism

Dominic Topp

Vision.” In Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies , ed. David Bordwell and Noël Carroll , 87 – 107 . Madison : University of Wisconsin Press . Lutz , Catherine A. 1988 . Unnatural Emotions: Everyday Sentiments on a Micronesian Atoll and