be the topic of the second section. Finally, the Sattelzeit (saddle period) provides the tools for the interpretation of a concrete historical problem. It refers to the time roughly between 1750 and 1850, which profoundly transformed Europe and in
Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 10 of 31 items for :
- "Sattelzeit" x
- Refine by Access: All content x
- Refine by Content Type: All x
Conceptual History of the Near East
The Sattelzeit as a Heuristic Tool for Interrogating the Formation of a Multilayered Modernity
Florian Zemmin and Henning Sievert
conceptually and arrive at a more plural understanding of modernity, which accounts for both commonalities and differences. It is only under this interest that the Sattelzeit (Saddle Period) can be considered a useful heuristic tool. Topal and Wigen
On the Notion of Historical (Dis)Continuity
Reinhart Koselleck's Construction of the Sattelzeit
Gabriel Motzkin
The author contends that a transition period is conceived in terms of its continuity with preceding or subsequent periods, rather than an entirely discontinuous temporal unit. Thus, in order to conceive of a period of transition, one must assume an overarching historical continuity. This contrasts with Reinhart Koselleck's and Michel Foucault's conception of the period of transition to modernity which is at once a break and part of the modern period. By analyzing how time is experienced in terms of contemporary awareness and retrospective consciousness, the author maps out the epistemological determinations that allow for the conception of a period of transition to modernity such as Sattelzeit.
Precarious Time, Morality, and the Republic
New Granada, 1818–1853
Francisco A. Ortega
ABSTRACT
Spanish American countries exhibited during the nineteenth century many of the features Koselleck associated with the Sattelzeit, the transitioning period into our contemporaneity. However, the region’s history was marked by social instability and political upheaval, and contemporaries referred to such experiences of time as precarious. In this article I explore the connection between this precarious time and the emergence of the sociopolitical concept of morality in New Granada (present-day Colombia) during the first thirty-five years of the republic (1818–1853). I focus on two conceptual moments as exemplified by the reflections put forth by Simón Bolívar (1783–1830), military and political leader of the independence period, and José Eusebio Caro (1817–1853), publicist, poet, and political ideologue of the Conservative Party.
The Modernity of Political Representation
Its Innovative Thrust and Transnational Semantic Transfers during the Sattelzeit (Eighteenth to Nineteenth Centuries)
Samuel Hayat and José María Rosales
studies the semantic and institutional changes of the concept of representation throughout the crucial period of the entrance of Europe into political democratic modernity, Reinhart Koselleck's Sattelzeit , 9 the era from the mid-eighteenth century to
Of Words, Change, and Transplantations
Reshaping Chinese Concepts between Empire and Modernity
Federico Brusadelli, Anne Schmiedl, and Phillip Grimberg
from the imperial to the post-imperial order—with the Koselleckian Sattelzeit . Within this framework, new light was shed on concepts such as nation and nationalism ( minzu , minzuzhuyi ), liberalism ( ziyouzhuyi ), democracy ( minzhu ), science
Reviews
An Invitation for the Curious; Into Blumenberg's Lens Cabinet; The Historian and His Images
Luc Wodzicki, Marcos Guntin, and Kerstin Maria Pahl
, Sattelzeit ) in chapters 4 to 7, embraced by broader interdisciplinary chapters 1 through 3 and 8 through 10, which emphasize that Begriffsgeschichte is much more than Reinhart Koselleck and offer a scope that goes beyond being a tool for historians. These
Ottoman Conceptual History
Challenges and Prospects
Alp Eren Topal and Einar Wigen
is, of course, the question of whether a research program for Ottoman Turkish conceptual history has any use for an “Ottoman Sattelzeit .” Koselleck proposed Sattelzeit as a heuristic tool for a particular period of conceptual rupture in European
Jan Ifversen
anachronistic claims about the existence of basic concepts that the historical actors did not use. Finally, Pocock also had problems accepting the basic idea of an increased and intense period of conceptual change, a Sattelzeit that heralded our modern
Part 2: After the Big Bang
The Fusing of New Approaches
Jan Ifversen
language set by specific cultural contexts, but he prefers to work with a micro perspective and not with the transformations set by large contexts such as the Sattelzeit or the institutional fields chosen by the Handbuch project. In his extraction of the