This article addresses the need to overcome theoretical weaknesses of both technologically and socially deterministic accounts of technological development. Technology does not simply 'impact' on local contexts, but nor does it act as a tabula rasa, subject to the free attribution of meaning by local social actors. Expanding on theoretical developments in the anthropology of art (Gell 1998) and gender and technology (Strathern 1988, 1999, 2001), the essay seeks to explore genetic technology as a social agent and as a technological 'index'. Examining a case of genetic technology regulation and innovation in Norway, the article argues that technology is best understood as an agent that is engaged with on an affective basis by those who interact with it.
Struggles for recognition by biotechnologists in Norway
A Study of Patients with Thalassemia in Iran
primary purpose is curing diseases or reducing suffering from illnesses. However, the application of genetic technologies to a public policy relating to reproduction is often discussed in association with eugenics, because it could lead to the exercise of
Catastrophes in the Age of Manufactured Uncertainty
postindustrial accidents in information and genetic technology. Virilio said that these move us toward the “generalized” accident. This is a shift from the contained “in situ” accidents and disasters of old to new “integral” accidents that will be experienced