Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 18 items for :

  • "practico-inert" x
  • Refine by Access: All content x
  • Refine by Content Type: All x
Clear All Modify Search
Restricted access

From In-Itself to Practico-Inert

Freedom, Subjectivity and Progress

Kimberly S. Engels

The practico-inert is a commonly mentioned term in Sartre’s A Critique of Dialectical Reason, Vol. 1 , 1 yet has received only modest attention in analyses of this major work. The concept is as important as it is complex. The shift from Sartre

Restricted access

Contemporary “Structures” of Racism

A Sartrean Contribution to Resisting Racial Injustice

Justin I. Fugo

refers to as the practico-inert , which I will explain further below. 3 Race is one of those ideas, and it is permeated with beliefs, norms, and values. And although a belief in the superiority or inferiority of racial groups–i.e., racism

Restricted access

Paul Gyllenhammer, Bruce Baugh, and Thomas R. Flynn

The articles in this section deal with two concepts from Sartre’s Critique of Dialectical Reason analyzed in the work of Tom Flynn. The first is the practico-inert, the materialized result of human activity that can turn that activity against itself, but which can also take on a positive and progressive role in history. It is this progressive role that Paul Gyllenhammer analyzes. Bruce Baugh’s article looks at Flynn’s analyses of how, in the Critique, the “third” mediates group praxis in such a way that it moves from passivity to activity but without fusing into a hyperorganism, and how this decisive shift accounts for “the revolutionary moment.”

Restricted access

Paul Gyllenhammer

we are tasked with battling the often unintended consequences of past actions, which are crystallized as practico-inert objects, practices, and social structures. Sartre cites various examples of our attempts to alter nature that end up backfiring

Restricted access

Joseph S. Catalano

I understand Sartre's ontology to develop in three stages: first, through Being and Nothingness and Saint Genet: Actor and Martyr; second, through the Critique of Dialectical Reason; and, finally, as it unfolds in The Family Idiot. Each stage depends upon the former and deepens the original ontology, while still introducing novel elements. For example, in Being and Nothingness, the in-itself, which is the source of our world-making, develops in the Critique into the practico-inert, which is the world made artifact, and in The Family Idiot, both the in-itself and the practico-inert unite to become the Spirit of the Age, joining our adventure with nature to that of our adventure with our family and our history. My reflection will be developed in four stages: first, a general overview; second, a more extended study of what Sartre calls the problematic of human reality; third, a brief reflection on Sartre's methodology; and finally, a concluding survey.

Restricted access

Joseph S. Catalano

My goal in writing this article is to give a brief overview of the two volumes of Sartre's Critique of Dialectical Reason. After a brief introduction, I proceed in three stages that move from the abstract to the concrete. I thus trace the development of such notions as comprehension into the dialectic, praxis into singularity and incarnation, the practico-inert into the totalization-of-envelopment, and the enhancement of the notion of scarcity as a general historical condition into a collective free choice. I also suggest new divisions for Critique II.

Free access

Editorial

Thinking with Sartre

Edited by John H. Gillespie and Sarah Richmond

, maintaining that perceptual looking sustains the absence of Pierre as intentional look. Kimberly Engels examines Sartre’s transition from the in-itself to the practico-inert, outlines his social and political development and suggests that a revised view of the

Free access

John Ireland and Constance Mui

we have a shared responsibility to transform the practico-inert features of our social world that reinforce racist attitudes and practices. Continuing a debate on Sartre's relationship to Marxism, Alfred Betschart argues in an exchange with Ron

Restricted access

What Would I Do with Lacan Today?

Thoughts on Sartre, Lacan, and Contemporary Psychoanalysis

Betty Cannon

: Who changes? For Sartre, of course, it is the individual subject who effects the change. Sartre, however, would not disagree that the subject is impacted by the exigencies of language as a “practico-inert” field. This is what he meant when he said in

Restricted access

Kyle Michael James Shuttleworth and Nik Farrell Fox

divides into four subsections. The first of these addresses freedom and the subject in Sartre's later work, comprising Patrick Chambers’ insightful analysis of the practico-inert in The Critique of Dialectical Reason , Marieke Mueller's discussion of the