This article gives a detailed account of the political processes and stages involved in the implementation of video surveillance devices in two major Portuguese cities, Oporto and Lisbon. It seeks to draw two main conclusions regarding the introduction of these systems in public areas and the developments that they have undergone over the period under analysis. The first is that installing these devices reflects a political response designed to provide a hasty solution to a social phenomenon—fear—that is largely subjective. The second is that the generalized perception as to the uncertainty of the effectiveness of these systems explains the lack of consistency and coordination in their implementation. The article concludes by discussing fear and insecurity in the context of concerns for a more efficient justice system.
Political Rhetoric at the Center of a Technological Project
Optics of regulation and control
Ieva Jusionyte and Daniel M. Goldstein
). Security’s theater of operations functions like the Foucauldian panopticon—a mechanism of surveillance that can be automated because its subjects internalize control. CCTV cameras in London, for example, and the public video surveillance in cities like
A Global Space for expanding transnational capital
Juan Manuel Sandoval Palacios
agent Felix Chavez described “unprecedent deployment of resources” (p. 39) along the entire US–México border: 377 remote video surveillance systems, 195 local video surveillance systems, 305 large-scale non-intrusive inspections systems, 75 Z Backscatter