Editorial
in Conflict and SocietySearch for other papers by Erella Grassiani in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alexander Horstmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lotte Buch Segal in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ronald Stade in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Henrik Vigh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Violence, defined as the intentional inflicting of injury and damage, seems to always have been a fact of human life. Whether in the shape of raids, ambushes, wars, massacres, genocides, insurgences, terrorism, or gang assaults, socially organized violence, that is, human groups orchestrating and committing violent acts, has been a steady companion of human life through the ages. The human quest to make sense of violence is probably as old as violence itself. Academic conflict research both continues and advances this quest. As long as wars were waged between nations, the research on armed conflicts focused on international relations and great power politics. This paradigm was kept alive even when the asymmetrical warfare of decolonization spread across the world, because by then the frame of analysis was the binary system of the Cold War and regional conflicts were classifi ed as proxy wars. After the end of the Cold War, the academic interest in forms of organized violence other than international conflict became more general in the social sciences, not least in anthropology, a discipline whose long-standing research interest in violent conflict previously had been directed almost exclusively towards “tribal warfare.” But, following their research tradition, anthropologists also began to conduct field studies in contemporary war zones and other violent settings.