Editors: Benjamin Abrams, University of Cambridge, and Giovanni A. Travaglino (Founding Editor), University of Kent
Volume 6 / 2018, 2 issues per volume (summer, winter)
Subjects: Protest Movements, Social Movements, Social Theory, Political Theory
The latest issue of Contention has recently been published. You can find it here.
Contention is dedicated to research on and about social protest and political behavior. The journal advances essential knowledge of a comprehensive range of collective actions, social movements, and other forms of political and social contention. By providing a multidiscipinary forum to scholars within and across the social sciences and humanities, it seeks to promote scholarly exchange and knowledge sharing among them.
While recognizing the importance of the contribution that the increasing specialization of knowledge has brought to the understanding of political behavior and collective action, Contention aims to reconstruct the fragmentation of the scientific discourse by offering in each issue a coherent but diversified range of articles from different theoretical, methodological, and philosophical approaches.
Contention is directed to a varied audience, including scholars and students from the arts and social sciences, and in general to individuals with a scientific and applied interest in the topic of social protest and collective action.
Contention welcomes theoretical, methodological, and empirical contributions; critical review of the current literature in relevant fields; and research articles that expand our basic knowledge on and about the antecedents and consequences of collective actions. Examples of suitable articles include but are not limited to:
- historical analysis of past and present collective movements
- social and political theory
- sociopsychological analysis of the cognitive and emotional correlates of social protest
- methodology of the study of social movements
- pedagogical implications of social change
- legal and economic implications and considerations
- art through and from social movements
Benjamin Abrams, University of Cambridge
Giovanni A. Travaglino (Founding Editor), University of Kent
Saheed Aderinto, Western Carolina University
Jeffrey Butcher, Oklahoma State University
Brian Callan, Goldsmith, University of London
Barbara Franchi, University of Kent
Peter R. Gardner, University of Aberdeen
Bob Jeffrey, Sheffield Hallam University
Matthew Ogilvie, Canterbury Christ Church University
Adriano Zamperini, University of Padua
Dominic Abrams, University of Kent
Manuel Castells, University of Cambridge
Donatella Della Porta, Scuola Normale Superiore
John Drury, University of Sussex
Bob Edwards, East Carolina University
Howard Giles, University of California, Santa Barbara
Peter Grant, University of Saskatchewan
John Jost, New York University
Alice Mattoni, Scuola Normale Superiore
Giovanni Piazza, University of Catania
Chris Pickvance, University of Kent
Stephen Reicher, University of St Andrews
Conny Roggeband, University of Amsterdam
Christopher Rootes, University of Kent
Please review the submission and style guide carefully before submitting.
Contention accepts research articles with novel findings, critical review articles (5,000 to 7,000 words, including notes and references), theoretical essays, and book reviews (800 to 1,200 words). Contention also accepts commentaries aiming at increasing interdisciplinary debate between authors. Academics may propose a commentary to one of the articles published or may be invited by the editors to comment on an article submitted for publication.
Please submit articles using the online system at http://ojs.berghahnjournals.com/index.php/contention.
Authors must register with the journal on the submission website before submitting, or, if already registered, they can simply log in. Authors have the option, on registering as an Author, of also registering as a Reviewer.
For general manuscript and journal inquiries, please contact the editors at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Contention will also take into consideration opportunities to publish special thematic issues. The journal editors, who invited guest editors, or scholars in the field can initiate special issues. To propose an idea for a special issue that you would like to guest edit, contact the editors at email@example.com to discuss the suitability and details of the project.
Please see the general Contention submission guide for formatting, style, and submission details.
Contention welcomes reviews of new books, articles, and conference papers or, exceptionally, of new editions of older influential books. Reviews should be 800 to 1,200 words.
Each review should be accompanied by a cover page with the following information:
The review should provide a short and clear overview of the work's content, as well as an estimation about its intended audience. In like with Contention's multidisciplinary audience, book reviews that link two or more fields of research or that illustrates the benefit of a book for relevant disciplines are especially welcomed.
The review should also be a critical evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the book, with the intellectual vigorousness, accuracy, and the high standards expected in any academic article. These evaluations can consider methodological concerns, evidence provided for the argument, and comparisons with other works on related subjects, where appropriate. Contention aims to publish book reviews that are more than mere descriptions of the work.
Authors published in Contention certify that their works are original and their own. The editors certify that all materials, with the possible exception of editorial introductions, book reviews and some types of commentary, have been subjected to double-blind peer review by qualified scholars in the field. While the publishers and the editorial board make every effort to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make clear that the data and opinions appearing in the articles herein are the sole responsibility of the contributor concerned. For a more detailed explanation concerning these qualifications and responsibilities, please see the complete Contention ethics statement.