The Aesthetics of the Oppressed and Democratic Freedom
Contention Volume 8, Issue 2
Editorial Peter R. Gardner and Benjamin Abrams
Protesting in Pandemic Times: COVID-19, Public Health, and Black Lives Matter Binoy Kampmark
How Students on College Campuses Created Opportunities for Workers in Sweatshops: A Multi-Institutional, Interlocking Approach to Political Opportunity Structure Matthew S. Williams
The “Brick and Mortar” of Mobilization?: Storytelling and Materiality in Anti-Asylum Seeker Center Protests in the Netherlands Iris Beau Segers
Environmental Movement Interventions in Tourism and Energy Development in the North Atlantic: Connecting the Social Movement Societies and Players and Arenas Perspectives Mark Stoddart, Alice Mattoni, and Elahe Nezhadhossein
Volume 8 / 2020, 2 issues per volume (summer, winter)
Aims & Scope
Contention is dedicated to research on social protest, collective action and contentious politics. As a multidisciplinary journal, Contention’s mission is to bridge scholarly divides and promote knowledge exchange across a diverse audience of scholars in the social sciences and humanities. The journal publishes articles by academics and practitioners on topics spanning the full range of social and political contention.
Contention welcomes research articles that expand our knowledge of contentious politics and social protest, as well as novel theoretical, methodological, and empirical contributions. The journal also publishes critical review articles, as well as book reviews of new or noteworthy texts.
Examples of suitable topics for Contention include but are not limited to:
Comparative studies of social movements
Analyses of revolutions or revolutionary waves
Quantitative research on protest
Ethnographic and historical analyses of past or present instances of contention
Social and political theory or methodology
Sociopsychological analysis of social protest and collective action
Pedagogical implications of social change
Legal and economic implications of social movements
Artistic or literary dimensions of social protest
In-depth empirical reports on recent protests or social movements
Movement-writing by practitioners and organizers
Contention is indexed/abstracted in:
European Reference Index for the Humanities and the Social Sciences (ERIH PLUS)
Deputy Chief Editors
Brian Callan, Goldsmiths, University of London, UK
Peter R. Gardner, University of York, UK
Robyn Gulliver, University of Queensland, Australia
Kai Heron, University of Manchester, UK
Matthew Ogilvie, Canterbury Christ Church University, UK
Rose Rickford, University of York, UK
Rim Saab, American University of Beirut, Lebanon
Felicity Turner-Zwinkels, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
Emily Westwell, Keele University, UK
Manuel Castells, University of Cambridge, UK
Donatella Della Porta, Scuola Normale Superiore, Italy
John Drury, University of Sussex, UK
Bob Edwards, East Carolina University, USA
Howard Giles, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA
Jeff Goodwin, New York University, USA
Peter Grant, University of Saskatchewan, Canada
Michael Herzfeld, Harvard University, USA
John Jost, New York University, USA
Alice Mattoni, Scuola Normale Superiore, Italy
Giovanni Piazza, University of Catania, Italy
Chris Pickvance, University of Kent, UK
Stephen Reicher, University of St Andrews, UK
Conny Roggeband, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Christopher Rootes, University of Kent, UK
Contention accepts research articles with novel findings, critical review articles (5,000 to 9,000 words, including notes and references), theoretical essays, and book reviews (800 to 1,200 words). Contention also accepts commentaries aiming at increasing interdisciplinary debate between authors. Academics may propose a commentary to one of the articles published or may be invited by the editors to comment on an article submitted for publication.
Authors must register with the journal on the submission website before submitting, or, if already registered, they can simply log in. Authors have the option, on registering as an Author, of also registering as a Reviewer.
Have other questions? Please refer to the Berghahn Info for Authors page for general information and guidelines including topics such as article usage and permissions for Berghahn journal article authors.
Contention will also take into consideration opportunities to publish special thematic issues. The journal editors, who invited guest editors, or scholars in the field can initiate special issues. To propose an idea for a special issue that you would like to guest edit, contact the editors at firstname.lastname@example.org to discuss the suitability and details of the project.
Please see the general Contention submission guide for formatting, style, and submission details.
Contention welcomes reviews of new books, articles, and conference papers or, exceptionally, of new editions of older influential books. Reviews should be 800 to 1,200 words. Each review should be accompanied by a cover page with the following information:
Name of Author (or Editor)
Place of Publication
Year of Publication
Number of Pages
Hardback or Paperback
The review should provide a short and clear overview of the work's content, as well as an estimation about its intended audience. In like with Contention's multidisciplinary audience, book reviews that link two or more fields of research or that illustrates the benefit of a book for relevant disciplines are especially welcomed.
The review should also be a critical evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the book, with the intellectual vigorousness, accuracy, and the high standards expected in any academic article. These evaluations can consider methodological concerns, evidence provided for the argument, and comparisons with other works on related subjects, where appropriate. Contention aims to publish book reviews that are more than mere descriptions of the work.
Authors published in Contention certify that their works are original and their own. The editors certify that all materials, with the possible exception of editorial introductions, book reviews and some types of commentary, have been subjected to double-blind peer review by qualified scholars in the field. While the publishers and the editorial board make every effort to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinions or statements appear in this journal, they wish to make clear that the data and opinions appearing in the articles herein are the sole responsibility of the contributor concerned. For a more detailed explanation concerning these qualifications and responsibilities, please see the complete Contention ethics statement.