Contradictory Discourses of Protection and Control in Transnational Asylum Law

in Journal of Legal Anthropology
Author:
Carol BohmerDartmouth College carol.bohmer@dartmouth.edu

Search for other papers by Carol Bohmer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Amy ShumanThe Ohio State University shuman.1@osu.edu

Search for other papers by Amy Shuman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

For immigration authorities, the goal of asylum hearings is to differentiate between economic migrants and legitimate political asylum seekers. However, in the stories asylum seekers tell, these categories often blur. Nevertheless, the asylum process uses this differentiation to conceal inequities in the system, and to justify denials. This article examines political asylum as a transnational and culturally local process and argues that contradictions between protection and control underlie some of the seemingly absurd denials of asylum applications.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 83 28 0
PDF Downloads 200 79 6