Data management in anthropology
The next phase in ethics governance?
in Social Anthropology/Anthropologie socialeSearch for other papers by Peter Pels in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Igor Boog in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by J. Henrike Florusbosch in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zane Kripe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tessa Minter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Metje Postma in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Margaret Sleeboom‐Faulkner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bob Simpson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hansjörg Dilger in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael Schönhuth in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anita Poser in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rosa Cordillera A. Castillo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rena Lederman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Heather Richards‐Rissetto in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Recent demands for accountability in ‘data management’ by funding agencies, universities, international journals and other academic institutions have worried many anthropologists and ethnographers. While their demands for transparency and integrity in opening up data for scrutiny seem to enhance scientific integrity, such principles do not always consider the way the social relationships of research are properly maintained. As a springboard, the present Forum, triggered by such recent demands to account for the use of ‘data’, discusses the present state of anthropological research and academic ethics/integrity in a broader perspective. It specifically gives voice to our disciplinary concerns and leads to a principled statement that clarifies a particularly ethnographic position. This position is then discussed by several commentators who treat its viability and necessity against the background of wider developments in anthropology – sustaining the original insight that in ethnography, research materials have been co‐produced before they become commoditised into ‘data’. Finally, in moving beyond such a position, the Forum broadens the issue to the point where other methodologies and forms of ownership of research materials will also need consideration.